Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disproportionately Elevated Proinsulin Levels Reflect the Degree of Impaired B Cell Secretory Capacity in Patients with Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus1

Røder, Michael E., Porte, Daniel, Schwartz, Robert S., Kahn, Steven E.·1998·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

An increased proportion of fasting proinsulin (PI) relative to immunoreactive insulin (IRI; increased PI/IRI) occurs in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To determine whether the magnitude of the increase in PI/IRI is an indicator of the degree of reduced B cell secretory capacity, we measured fasting plasma glucose, PI, IRI, and PI/IRI and related them to maximal B cell secretory capacity (AIRmax) in 9 subjects with NIDDM [age, 61 +/- 3 yr; body mass index (BMI), 27.5 +/- 1.3 kg/m2; duration of NIDDM, 10.8 +/- 1.8 yr; mean +/- SEM] and in 10 healthy subjects matched for age and BMI (age, 61 +/- 6 yr; BMI, 27.9 +/- 1.5 kg/m2). AIRmax was quantified as the incremental insulin response to i.v. arginine at maximal glycemic potentiation (plasma glucose > 25 mmol/L). Mean fasting plasma glucose was 13.7 +/- 1.4 mmol/L (range, 7.5-18.3 mmol/L) in NIDDM subjects and 5.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in the controls. Fasting PI was higher in NIDDM (33.1 +/- 5.2) than in controls (9.4 +/- 2.5 pmol/L; P < 0.01), but IRI levels were similar (93.4 +/- 10.9 vs. 82.8 +/- 23.4 pmol/L; P = NS). The PI/IRI ratio was significantly elevated in NIDDM compared to control subjects (35.9 +/- 4.1% vs. 12.8 +/- 0.8%; P < 0.01). After elevation of the glucose level to 30.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (NIDDM) and 30.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/L (controls), AIRmax was quantified as 622 +/- 71 pmol/L in NIDDM and 1997 +/- 315 pmol/L in controls, (P < 0.001). The PI/IRI ratio correlated inversely with AIRmax in the NIDDM patients (r = -0.76; P < 0.01). We conclude that the magnitude of the elevation in fasting PI/IRI is related to the reduction in AIRmax. Thus, the fasting PI/IRI ratio appears to be a marker of the degree of reduced AIRmax in NIDDM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.83.2.4544

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Røder, M. E., Porte, D., Schwartz, R. S., & Kahn, S. E.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1998-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
604-608
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2023173827
Cited by
207
References
8
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disproportionately Elevated Proinsulin Levels Reflect the Degree of Impaired B Cell Secretory Capacity in Patients with Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem.83.2.4544
The paper
Røder, M. E., Porte, D., Schwartz, R. S., & Kahn, S. E. (1998). Disproportionately Elevated Proinsulin Levels Reflect the Degree of Impaired B Cell Secretory Capacity in Patients with Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.83.2.4544

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.