Cited by 204Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of the Integrity of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis by Insulin Hypoglycemia Test1

Erturk, Erdinc, Jaffe, Craig A., Barkan, Ariel L.·1998·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed dynamic ACTH and cortisol responses to insulin hypoglycemia in 193 subjects with suspected ACTH deficiency to ascertain the predictive values of various diagnostic criteria. Based on the achievement of a peak cortisol level of 18 micrograms/dL or above, 133 subjects were classified as having an intact hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and 60 subjects were determined to have ACTH deficiency. Baseline and peak cortisol concentrations were strongly correlated (r = 0.63; P < 0.0001). Peak cortisol increased in parallel to ACTH increments, but plateaued at approximately 22 micrograms/dL at peak ACTH levels above approximately 75 pg/mL (r = 0.61; P < 0.0001). Basal cortisol values above 17 micrograms/dL or below 4 micrograms/dL were highly predictive of an intact or impaired HPA axis, respectively, but intermediate values had only limited sensitivity and specificity. The criteria of HPA axis integrity, defined as an increment in plasma cortisol of more than 7 micrograms/dL above the baseline or as a doubling of the baseline cortisol value, were associated with high false positive and false negative rates. We conclude that 1) the baseline morning serum cortisol concentration has very limited predictive power in differentiating between normal and impaired HPA function; 2) the use of criteria based on incremental changes in serum cortisol from baseline leads to unacceptably high false positive and false negative rates; and 3) insulin hypoglycemia i…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.83.7.4980

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Erturk, E., Jaffe, C. A., & Barkan, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1998-07
Volume
83
Issue
7
Pages
2350-2354
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2073360576
Cited by
204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R01-38449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, ACTH deficiency, insulin hypoglycemia test, ACTH stimulation test, cortisol response, diagnostic criteria, false positive and false negative rates, stress response
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review