Cited by 368Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Lack of Suppression of Glucagon Contributes to Postprandial Hyperglycemia in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus1

Shah, Pankaj, Vella, Adrian, Basu, Ananda, Basu, Rita, Schwenk, W. Frederick, Rizza, Robert A.·2000·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that a lack of suppression of glucagon causes postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Nine diabetic subjects ingested 50 g glucose on two occasions. On both occasions, somatostatin was infused at a rate of 4.3 nmol/kg x min, and insulin was infused in a diabetic insulin profile. On one occasion, glucagon was also infused at a rate of 1.25 ng/kg x min to maintain portal glucagon concentrations constant (nonsuppressed study day). On the other occasion, glucagon infusion was delayed by 2 h to create a transient decrease in glucagon (suppressed study day). Glucagon concentrations on the suppressed study day fell to about 70 ng/L during the first 2 h, rising thereafter to approximately 120 ng/L. In contrast, glucagon concentrations on the nonsuppressed study day remained constant at about 120 ng/L throughout. The decrease in glucagon resulted in substantially lower (P < 0.001) glucose concentrations on the suppressed compared with the nonsuppressed study days (9.2+/-0.7 vs. 10.9+/-0.8 mmol/L) and a lower (P < 0.001) rate of release of [14C]glucose from glycogen (labeled by infusing [1-14C]galactose). On the other hand, flux through the hepatic UDP-glucose pool (and, by implication, glycogen synthesis), measured using the acetaminophen glucuronide method, did not differ on the two occasions. We conclude that lack of suppression of glucagon contributes to postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with type 2 diabetes at least in part by acc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6993

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, P., Vella, A., Basu, A., Basu, R., Schwenk, W. F., & Rizza, R. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2000-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
4053-4059
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2025993954
Cited by
368
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK050456, DK50456, DK 29953)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00585, M01RR000585)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
glucagon, postprandial hyperglycemia, type 2 diabetes, glucagon suppression, glycogenolysis, liver glycogen, hepatic glycogen synthesis, somatostatin, insulin
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Galactose, Glucagon, Glycogen, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Human Growth Hormone, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review