Cited by 75Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsChemistry and Chemical Engineering

Drug substances presented as sulfonic acid salts: Overview of utility, safety and regulation

Open access
Elder, David P., Snodin, David J.·2009·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Controlling genotoxic impurities represents a significant challenge to both industry and regulators. The potential for formation of genotoxic short-chain alkyl esters of sulfonic acids during synthesis of sulfonic acid salts is a long-standing regulatory concern. This review provides a general overview of the utility of sulfonic acids as salt-forming moieties and discusses strategies for effectively minimizing the potential for alkyl sulfonate formation during the synthesis and processing of sulfonate salt active pharmaceutical ingredients. The potential implications of the recent establishment of a substantial human threshold dose for ethyl methanesulfonate for the safety assessment of alkyl sulfonates in general are also discussed. KEY FINDINGS: The formation of alkyl sulfonates requires highly acidic conditions, possibly combined with long reaction times and/or elevated temperatures, to generate significant amounts, and these conditions are most unlikely to be present in the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredient sulfonate salts. It is possible to design salt formation conditions, using a short-chain alcohol as solvent, to manufacture sulfonate salts that are essentially free of alkyl sulfonate impurities. Processes using non-acidic conditions such as ethanol recrystallization or wet granulation should not raise any concerns of alkyl sulfonate formation. SUMMARY: An understanding of the mechanism of formation of alkyl sulfonates is critical in order to avoid restricting or over-controlling sulfonic acid salts, which have many technical advantages as pharmaceutical counterions. Recent regulatory acceptance of a human threshold limit dose of 2 mg/kg per day for ethyl methanesulfonate, indicating that its toxicological risks have previously been considerably overestimated, could signal the beginning of the end over safety concerns on alkyl sulfonate residues, thus removing a major constraint from the exploitation of sulfonic acid counterions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1211/jpp.61.03.0001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sulfonate group can act as a DNA alkylating agent and genotoxic agent in bacterial and mammalian cells.

    “In addition to environmental toxicity, the sulfonate group’s ability to act as DNA alkylating agents, and as a genotoxic agent in bacterial and mammalian cells was already reported [82].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Introduction states that alkyl esters of sulfonic acids can alkylate DNA and have shown genotoxic effects in bacterial and mammalian cells. It attributes those effects to the esters, not to the sulfonate group on its own. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare. Enquiry: alkyl mesilate (methanesulfonate) impu- rities in mesilate salts. Pharmeuropa 2000; 12: 27.
  2. United States Pharmacopeia. Atracurium Besylate monograph. USP 2006; 29: 217.
  3. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare. Potentially genotoxic impurities and European pharmacopeia monographs on substance for human use. Pharmeuropa 2008; 20: 426.
  4. European Medicines Agency. Press release, 21 June 2007. European Medicines Agency agrees on action plan following the recall of Viracept and recommends suspension of the market- ing authorisation. EMEA/275367/2007. London: European Medicines Agency, 2007.
  5. European Medicines Agency. Press release, 20 September 2007. European Medicines Agency recommends lifting of suspension of Viracept. EMEA/418168/2007. London: European Medicines Agency, 2007.
  6. Anderson BD, Flora KP. Preparation of water soluble com-pounds through salt formation. In: Wermuth CG, ed. The Practices of Medicinal Chemistry. London: Academic Press, 1996: 739-754.
  7. Zhu H et al. Dehydration, hydration behaviour, and structural analysis of fenoprofen calcium. J Pharm Sci 2001; 90: 845-859.
  8. Lee S, Hoff C. Large scale aspects of salt formation: processing of intermediates and final products. In: Stahl PH, Wermuth G, eds. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Salts: Properties, Selection and Use. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. New York: Wiley-VCH, 2002: 191-220.
  9. Chen TK et al. Reduction of dimethylsulfoxide by dihydroha- lide salts of pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm 1990; 59: 211-216.
  10. European Medicines Agency. Press release, 20 September 2007. CHMP Assessment report for Viracept. EMEA/H/C/164/Z/109. London: European Medicines Agency, 2007.
  11. Chapp NK et al. Oncogenicity by methanesulfonate in male RF mice. Science 1968; 161(844): 913-914.
  12. Miller SA et al. A new capillary GC/MS method for determining ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and its stability in a drug product formulation. Poster presentation. 52 nd ASMS Conference, Nashville, TN, May 2004.
  13. Frei JV et al. Alkylation of deoxyribonucleic acid in vivo in various organs of C57BL mice by the carcinogens N-methyl-N- nitrosourea, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea and ethyl methanesulpho- nate in relation to induction of thymic lymphoma. Biochem J 1978; 174: 1031-1044.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elder, D. P., & Snodin, D. J.
Affiliations
PAREXEL International (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Elder, David P.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
2009-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
269-278
ISSN
0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237486075
Cited by
75
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Keywords
sulfonates, alkyl sulfonates, genotoxic impurities, ethyl methanesulfonate, active pharmaceutical ingredient synthesis, wet granulation
MeSH terms
Alkanesulfonates, Drug Contamination, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Ethyl Methanesulfonate, Humans, Maximum Allowable Concentration, Mutagens, Solvents, Sulfonic Acids, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review