Cited by 115Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Education, cognitive function, and severity of neuropathology in Alzheimer disease

Koepsell, T. D., Kurland, B. F., Harel, O., Johnson, E. A., Zhou, X. -H., Kukull, W. A.·2008·Neurology

Abstract

Background Education may modulate the degree to which the neuropathology of Alzheimer disease (AD) is expressed as impaired cognitive performance. Methods We studied 2,051 participants age 65+ years at 27 AD Centers who died and underwent autopsy. All took the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) within 2 years before death. Braak & Braak stage, neuritic plaque density, and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and National Institute on Aging (NIA)/Reagan diagnostic classifications quantified AD neuropathologic severity. Multivariate analyses modeled MMSE in relation to education and neuropathologic severity, adjusting for age at death, Lewy body pathology, and vascular dementia. Results Higher education was associated with higher MMSE scores when AD neuropathology was absent or mild. But with more advanced neuropathology, differences in MMSE scores among education levels were attenuated. For example, among patients without AD by NIA/Reagan criteria, fitted MMSE scores ranged from 19.6 for patients with less than high school education to 25.9 with education beyond high school. But among patients with neuropathologically advanced AD, the range of scores by education was only 7.1 to 8.6. Conclusions We found no evidence of larger education-related differences in cognitive function when Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology was more advanced. Higher Mini-Mental State Examination scores among more educated persons with mild or no AD may reflect better test-ta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000284603.85621.aa

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koepsell, T. D., Kurland, B. F., Harel, O., Johnson, E. A., Zhou, X. H., & Kukull, W. A.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2008-05-06
Volume
70
Issue
19_part_2
Pages
1732-1739
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2063509852
Cited by
115
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG016976)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, educational attainment, cognitive reserve, cognitive function, Braak staging, neuritic plaques, Lewy body pathology, vascular dementia, Mini-Mental State Examination, older adults, autopsy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Autopsy, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Environment, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics as Topic, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review