Cited by 236Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment progresses to dementia with Lewy bodies

Open access
Ferman, Tanis J., Smith, Glenn E., Kantarci, Kejal, Boeve, Bradley F., Pankratz, V. Shane, Dickson, Dennis W., Graff-Radford, Neill R., Wszolek, Zbigniew +8 more·2013·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: We followed 337 patients with MCI in the Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (range 2-12 years). Competing risks survival models were used to examine the rates of progression to clinically probable DLB and Alzheimer disease (AD). A subset of patients underwent neuropathologic examination. RESULTS: In this clinical cohort, 116 remained as MCI, while 49 progressed to probable DLB, 162 progressed to clinically probable AD, and 10 progressed to other dementias. Among nonamnestic MCI, progression rate to probable DLB was 20 events per 100 person-years and to probable AD was 1.6 per 100 person-years. Among amnestic MCI, progression rate to probable AD was 17 events per 100 person-years, and to DLB was 1.5 events per 100 person-years. In 88% of those who developed probable DLB, the baseline MCI diagnosis included attention and/or visuospatial deficits. Those who developed probable DLB were more likely to have baseline daytime sleepiness and subtle parkinsonism. In 99% of the clinically probable AD group, the baseline MCI diagnosis included memory impairment. Neuropathologic confirmation was obtained in 24 of 30 of those with clinically probable AD, and in 14 of 18 of those with clinically probable DLB. CONCLUSION: In a clinical sample, patients with nonamnestic MCI were more likely to develop DLB, and those with amnestic MCI were more likely to develop probable AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436942.55281.47

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of objective tests of other cognitive domains reduces the ability to detect cognitive impairment profiles that might identify distinct subtypes of MCI that vary in clinical and biological characteristics.

    “Finally, the lack of objective tests of other cognitive domains reduces the ability to detect cognitive impairment profiles that might identify distinct subtypes of MCI that vary in clinical and biological characteristics [19–21].”
  • One caveat of our study was the absence of assessing other cognitive domains like visuospatial functions.

    “One caveat of our study was the absence of assessing other cognitive domains like that of visuospatial functions, particularly since we have previously identified a visuospatial MCI subtype [31] and Ferman et al. [19] have shown that baseline MCI diagnoses based on visuospatial deficits reliably predict development of dementia with Lewy bodies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferman, T. J., Smith, G. E., Kantarci, K., Boeve, B. F., Pankratz, V. S., Dickson, D. W., Graff-Radford, N. R., Wszolek, Z., Van Gerpen, J., Uitti, R., Pedraza, O., Murray, M. E., Aakre, J., Parisi, J., Knopman, D. S., & Petersen, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • From the Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology (T.J.F., O.P.), Pathology (D.W.D., M.E.M.), and Neurology (N.R.G.-R, Z.W., J.V.G., R.U.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology (G.E.S.), Radiology (K.K.), Neurology (B.F.B., D.S.K., R.C.P.), Health Sciences Research (V.S.P., J.A.), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (J.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-12-03
Volume
81
Issue
23
Pages
2032-2038
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2148434166
Cited by
236
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 10
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG015866, P50‐AG16574, U01-AG0678, P50AG016574)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50 NS72187-01, P50NS072187)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, conversion to dementia, competing risks, attention deficits, visuospatial deficits, daytime sleepiness, parkinsonism, neuropathology, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amnesia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Lewy Body Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review