Cited by 54Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal relationships among biomarkers for Alzheimer disease in the Adult Children Study

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and how longitudinal rates of change in MRI volumetrics, CSF concentrations of Alzheimer-related proteins, molecular imaging of cerebral fibrillar amyloid with PET using the [(11)C] benzothiazole tracer, Pittsburgh compound B (PiB), and cognition were associated among asymptomatic middle-aged to older individuals. METHODS: Multivariate mixed models for repeated measures were used to assess the correlations on the rates of changes across markers. RESULTS: Among 209 asymptomatic middle-aged to older individuals longitudinally followed for up to 11 years (mean 6.7 years), a faster intraindividual decrease in CSF Aβ42 was associated with a faster increase in PiB mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (MCSUVR, p = 0.04), but not others. The rate of change in CSF tau (and Ptau181) was correlated with the rate of change in PiB MCSUVR (p = 0.002), hippocampal volume (p = 0.04), and global cognition (p = 0.008). The rate of change in hippocampal volume was correlated with the rate of change in global cognition (p = 0.04). Only 3 significant correlations were observed at baseline: CSF Aβ42 and PiB MCSUVR (p < 0.001), CSF tau and PiB MCSUVR (p < 0.001), and CSF Aβ42 and global cognition (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CSF tau (Ptau181), PiB MCSUVR, and hippocampal volume were all longitudinally correlated with each other, whereas CSF Aβ42 was correlated only with PiB binding. Unlike the baseline values, the longitudinal change in CSF tau (Ptau181) and hippocampal volume were correlated with the longitudinal change in global cognition, validating the role of these biomarkers in Alzheimer disease prevention trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002593

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1997.
  2. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed): Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1977.
  3. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Booklet, III, Oral Expression, J. Animal Naming (Fluency in Controlled Association). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xiong, C., Jasielec, M. S., Weng, H., Fagan, A. M., Benzinger, T. L. S., Head, D., Hassenstab, J., Grant, E., Sutphen, C. L., Buckles, V., Moulder, K. L., & Morris, J. C.
Affiliations
From the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (C.X., M.S.J., H.W., A.M.F., T.L.S.B., D.H., J.H., E.G., C.L.S., V.B., K.L.M., J.C.M.), Departments of Neurology (V.B., K.L.M., A.M.F., J.H., J.C.M., C.L.S.), Pathology and Immunology (J.C.M.), Physical Therapy (J.C.M.), and Occupational Therapy (J.C.M.), Division of Biostatistics (C.X., M.S.J., H.W., E.G.), and Departments of Psychology (D.H., J.H.), Radiology (T.L.S.B., D.H.), and Neurological Surgery (T.L.S.B.), Washington...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
86
Issue
16
Pages
1499-1506
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2308877313
Cited by
54
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034119, P50AG005681, P01AG003991, P01AG026276)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK094982)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, CSF tau, CSF amyloid-beta 42, Pittsburgh compound B, amyloid PET, hippocampal volume, longitudinal change, cognition, biomarker correlation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Peptide Fragments, Phosphorylation, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Adult Children, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review