Cited by 80Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPolyomavirus and related diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progressive solitary sclerosis: Gradual motor impairment from a single CNS demyelinating lesion

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report patients with progressive motor impairment resulting from an isolated CNS demyelinating lesion in cerebral, brainstem, or spinal cord white matter that we call progressive solitary sclerosis. METHODS: Thirty patients were identified with (1) progressive motor impairment for over 1 year with a single radiologically identified CNS demyelinating lesion along corticospinal tracts, (2) absence of other demyelinating CNS lesions, and (3) no history of relapses affecting other CNS pathways. Twenty-five were followed prospectively in our multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic and 5 were identified retrospectively from our progressive MS database. Patients were excluded if an alternative etiology for progressive motor impairment was found. Multiple brain and spinal cord MRI were reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the clinical details. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 48.5 years (range 23-71) and 15 (50%) were women. The median follow-up from symptom onset was 100 months (range 15-343 months). All had insidiously progressive upper motor neuron weakness attributable to the solitary demyelinating lesion found on MRI. Clinical presentations were hemiparesis/monoparesis (n = 24), quadriparesis (n = 5), and paraparesis (n = 1). Solitary MRI lesions involved cervical spinal cord (n = 18), cervico-medullary/brainstem region (n = 6), thoracic spinal cord (n = 4), and subcortical white matter (n = 2). CSF abnormalities consistent with MS were found in 13 of 26 (50%). Demyelinating disease was confirmed pathologically in 2 (biopsy, 1; autopsy, 1). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive solitary sclerosis results from an isolated CNS demyelinating lesion. Future revisions to MS diagnostic criteria could incorporate this presentation of demyelinating disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003235

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.190 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00019052-200206000-00003 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/jnnp.53.2.146 · DOI
  4. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247cc8c · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1352458515570405 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1352458514535129 · DOI
  7. 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000283 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001094 · DOI
  9. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1212/WNL.59.4.499 · DOI
  12. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821f468f · DOI
  13. 10.1093/qjmed/92.2.103 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s11060-011-0781-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b00b9 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/ana.24184 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00415-012-6475-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e24136 · DOI
  19. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001186 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/ana.24564 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1352458512464829 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f5d4da · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
Keegan, B. M., Kaufmann, T. J., Weinshenker, B. G., Kantarci, O. H., Schmalstieg, W. F., Paz Soldan, M. M., & Flanagan, E. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • From the Departments of Neurology (B.M.K., O.H.K., E.P.F.) and Neuroradiology (T.J.K., B.G.W.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Department of Neurology (W.F.S.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Department of Neurology (M.M.P.S.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-10-18
Volume
87
Issue
16
Pages
1713-1719
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2519519793
Cited by
80
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000114, KL2TR000113)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, motor impairment, spinal cord demyelination, brainstem demyelination, white matter lesions, hemiparesis, paraparesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Demyelinating Diseases, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Movement Disorders, Prospective Studies, Pyramidal Tracts, Retrospective Studies, Sclerosis, Disease Progression, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review