Cited by 85Circadian rhythm and melatoninTreatment of Major DepressionParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bright light therapy for depression in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Rutten, Sonja, Vriend, Chris, Smit, Jan H., Berendse, Henk W., van Someren, Eus J.W., Hoogendoorn, Adriaan W., Twisk, Jos W. R., van der Werf, Ysbrand D., van den Heuvel, Odile A.·2019·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy of bright light therapy (BLT) in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to a control light. Methods In this double-blind controlled trial, we randomized patients with PD and MDD to treatment with BLT (±10,000 lux) or a control light (±200 lux). Participants were treated for 3 months, followed by a 6-month naturalistic follow-up. The primary outcome of the study was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score. Secondary outcomes were objective and subjective sleep measures and salivary melatonin and cortisol concentrations. Assessments were repeated halfway, at the end of treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with a linear mixed-model analysis. Results We enrolled 83 participants. HDRS scores decreased in both groups without a significant between-group difference at the end of treatment. Subjective sleep quality improved in both groups, with a larger improvement in the BLT group (B [SE] = 0.32 [0.16], p = 0.04). Total salivary cortisol secretion decreased in the BLT group, while it increased in the control group (B [SE] = −8.11 [3.93], p = 0.04). Conclusion BLT was not more effective in reducing depressive symptoms than a control light. Mood and subjective sleep improved in both groups. BLT was more effective in improving subjective sleep quality than control light, possibly through a BLT-induced decrease in cortisol levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01604876. Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that BLT is not superior to a control light device in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with PD with MDD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007090

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fahn S, Elton R. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale: In Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. Hamilton: Macmillan Healthcare Information; 1987:153–163; 93–304.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
Rutten, S., Vriend, C., Smit, J. H., Berendse, H. W., van Someren, E. J. W., Hoogendoorn, A. W., Twisk, J. W. R., van der Werf, Y. D., & van den Heuvel, O. A.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
  • From Amsterdam UMC (S.R., C.V., J.H.S., E.J.W.v.S., A.W.H., O.A.v.d.H.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Research and Innovation (S.R., J.H.S., A.W.H., O.A.v.d.H.), GGZ InGeest; Amsterdam UMC (C.V., H.W.B., Y.D.v.d.W.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience; Amsterdam UMC (H.W.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Sleep and...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2019-03-12
Volume
92
Issue
11
Pages
e1145-e1156
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2912349634
Cited by
85
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hersenstichting
  • Parkinson Vereniging
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
bright light therapy, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, depression, sleep quality, salivary cortisol, salivary melatonin, light intensity
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Phototherapy, Saliva, Sleep, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review