The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cerebral Microbleeds: Analysis From the UK Biobank
Abstract
Background and Objectives To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) at different locations in a large healthy community population. Methods A total of 8,159 participants from the UK Biobank with MRI scans suitable for CMB analysis were included. Brain susceptibility-weighted imaging data were acquired on 2 identical 3.0T scanners. The Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale was used to identify definite CMBs. Generalized linear models were used to determine independent associations with all CMBs and lobar, deep, and infratentorial CMBs. Results The mean age at scan was 62.1 ± 7.4 years. One or more definite CMBs were detected in 572 (7.0%) participants. Of those with CMBs, 439 (76.7%) had lobar CMBs, 103 (18.0%) had deep CMBs, and 83 (14.5%) had infratentorial CMBs. Age was an independent risk factor for CMBs in all locations. APOE4 and male sex were positively associated and higher body mass index was negatively associated with lobar CMBs. Hypertension, smoking, and alcohol consumption were associated with deep CMBs, but not with lobar CMBs. Only age was associated with infratentorial CMBs. The associations were unchanged after controlling for white matter hyperintensity lesion volume as a marker of small vessel disease severity. Discussion In this large population-based study, CMB prevalence detected using a low sensitivity and high specificity system was 7%. There were distinct risk factor profiles for CMBs in lobar and deep locations consistent with different underlying pathophysiologic processes. Trial Registration Information Clinical Trial registration number: UK Biobank application number 19463.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lobar microbleeds are associated with amyloid pathology while deep/basal ganglia microbleeds are associated with hypertensive small vessel disease [36, 37].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Lobar microbleeds are associated with amyloid pathology while deep/basal ganglia microbleeds are associated with hypertensive small vessel disease [36, 37].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation
Greenberg, S. M., Vernooij, M. W., Cordonnier, C., Viswanathan, A., Al-Shahi Salman, R., Warach, S., Launer, L. J., Van Buchem, M. A., & Breteler, M. M. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70013-4 · Cited by 1,798
Ageing and brain white matter structure in 3,513 UK Biobank participants
Cox, S. R., Ritchie, S. J., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Liewald, D. C., Hagenaars, S. P., Davies, G., Wardlaw, J. M., Gale, C. R., Bastin, M. E., & Deary, I. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13629 · Cited by 487
Rensma, S. P., van Sloten, T. T., Launer, L. J., & Stehouwer, C. D. A. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.003 · Cited by 326
Shams, S., Martola, J., Granberg, T., Li, X., Shams, M., Fereshtehnejad, S. M., Cavallin, L., Aspelin, P., Kristoffersen-Wiberg, M., & Wahlund, L. O. (2015) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a4176 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/JAHA.115.002377 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-12176-y · DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.113.000359 · DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.117.007360 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.20198 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34a7d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.118 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/JAHA.116.003477 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.02.018 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000307750.41970.d9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016261 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018336 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.629634 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0174 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028487 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026235 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, D., Liu, J., MacKinnon, A. D., Tozer, D. J., & Markus, H. S.
- Affiliations
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2021-10-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- e1493-e1502
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W3195351147
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cerebral microbleeds, prevalence, risk factors, lobar microbleeds, APOE ε4, hypertension, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, age, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral small vessel disease, susceptibility-weighted imaging, UK Biobank
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review