Cited by 1,582Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI)

Haacke, E. Mark, Xu, Yingbiao, Cheng, Yu‐Chung N., Reichenbach, Jürgen R.·2004·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Susceptibility differences between tissues can be utilized as a new type of contrast in MRI that is different from spin density, T1-, or T2-weighted imaging. Signals from substances with different magnetic susceptibilities compared to their neighboring tissue will become out of phase with these tissues at sufficiently long echo times (TEs). Thus, phase imaging offers a means of enhancing contrast in MRI. Specifically, the phase images themselves can provide excellent contrast between gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), iron-laden tissues, venous blood vessels, and other tissues with susceptibilities that are different from the background tissue. Also, for the first time, projection phase images are shown to demonstrate tissue (vessel) continuity. In this work, the best approach for combining magnitude and phase images is discussed. The phase images are high-pass-filtered and then transformed to a special phase mask that varies in amplitude between zero and unity. This mask is multiplied a few times into the original magnitude image to create enhanced contrast between tissues with different susceptibilities. For this reason, this method is referred to as susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Mathematical arguments are presented to determine the number of phase mask multiplications that should take place. Examples are given for enhancing GM/WM contrast and water/fat contrast, identifying brain iron, and visualizing veins in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.20198

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haacke, E. M., Xu, Y., Cheng, Y. N., & Reichenbach, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Haacke, E. Mark
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-23
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
612-618
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2146336531
Cited by
1,582
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 97
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG020948, AG 20948)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL062983, HL62983)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
susceptibility-weighted imaging, phase imaging, magnetic susceptibility contrast, brain iron, phase mask, high-pass filtering
MeSH terms
Body Water, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Humans, Iron, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review