Cited by 123Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Multiple Sclerosis Prevalence

Open access
Langer-Gould, Annette M., Gonzales, Edlin Grisell, Smith, Jessica B., Li, Bonnie H., Nelson, Lorene M.·2022·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to determine whether the prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) varies by race and ethnicity. METHODS: code for MS between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010 were reviewed. MS prevalence and 95% CIs stratified by age, sex, and race and ethnicity among 2010 members were estimated with binomial regression. Age- and sex-standardized prevalence was estimated according to the 2010 US Census population. RESULTS: We identified 3,863 patients with MS. The average age of patients with prevalent MS was 51.7 years (SD 13.1 years), and 76.8% were women. The female preponderance was more pronounced among Black (81.2%) and Asian (83.6%) than White (76.3%) or Hispanic (74.5%) individuals with MS. Age- and sex-standardized MS prevalence per 100,000 was similarly high among Black (225.8, 95% CI 207.1-244.5) and White (237.7, 95% CI 228.2-247.2) and significantly lower among Hispanic (69.9, 95% CI 64.4-75.5) and Asian (22.6, 95% CI 17.1-28.1) persons. MS prevalence was highest between the ages of 35 and 64 years and declined after 65 years of age across all racial and ethnic groups. Among adults 18 to 24 years of age, the crude MS prevalence was low but was highest among Black and Hispanic young adults, lower in White people, and lowest in Asian/Pacific Islander individuals (48.5, 25.0, 18.0, and 7.1 per 100,000, respectively). DISCUSSION: MS prevalence varies by race and ethnicity, being similarly high in White and Black and significantly lower in Hispanic and Asian persons in Southern California. Taken together with previous studies, these findings indicate that the burden of MS in the US Black community has long been underrecognized. More studies are needed to determine whether MS is an emerging disease among US Hispanic adults and whether MS susceptibility and prevalence vary among Hispanic or Asian individuals from different cultures or ancestral backgrounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200151

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 MS Prevalence by Race and Ethnicity in Southern California Prevalence (indicated by the number above each bar in B) and 95% CIs of multiple sclerosis (MS) in White (blue), Black (black), Hispanic (green), and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (orange) individuals residing in Southern California by age groups by years (A) and sex (B). MS prevalence is highest in White and Black persons, lower in Hispanic individuals, and lowest in the heterogeneous group of Asian/Pacific Islander persons residing in Southern California across all age groups except 18- to 24-year-olds, for whom the prevalence in Hispanic persons is similar to that in White and highest in Black persons. MS prevalence continues to increase with age in White persons through 55 to 64 years of age, whereas in Black persons, MS prevalence rises until 35 to 44 years of age and then remains stable through 55 to 64 years of age. MS prevalence declines in the ≥65-year-old age groups across all racial and ethnic groups. MS prevalence is similar in Black and White persons in both women (crude risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.84–1.03, p = 0.17, Poisson regression with White persons as the reference group) and men (crude RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75–1.02, p = 0.39, Poisson regression with White persons as the reference group). MS prevalence is lower in Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander compared to White persons, regardless of sex. MS prevalence is higher in women compared to men across all racial and ethnic groups (White individuals: crude RR 3.09, 95% CI 2.82–3.39, p < 0.0001; Black individuals: crude RR 3.15, 95% CI 2.56–3.88, p < 0.0001; Hispanic individuals: crude RR 2.66, 95% CI 2.23–3.17, p < 0.0001; Asian/Pacific Islander individuals: crude RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.16–7.87, p < 0.0001).
Figure 1 MS Prevalence by Race and Ethnicity in Southern California Prevalence (indicated by the number above each bar in B) and 95% CIs of multiple sclerosis (MS) in White (blue), Black (black), Hispanic (green), and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (orange) individuals residing in Southern California by age groups by years (A) and sex (B). MS prevalence is highest in White and Black persons, lower in Hispanic individuals, and lowest in the heterogeneous group of Asian/Pacific Islander persons residing in Southern California across all age groups except 18- to 24-year-olds, for whom the prevalence in Hispanic persons is similar to that in White and highest in Black persons. MS prevalence continues to increase with age in White persons through 55 to 64 years of age, whereas in Black persons, MS prevalence rises until 35 to 44 years of age and then remains stable through 55 to 64 years of age. MS prevalence declines in the ≥65-year-old age groups across all racial and ethnic groups. MS prevalence is similar in Black and White persons in both women (crude risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.84–1.03, p = 0.17, Poisson regression with White persons as the reference group) and men (crude RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75–1.02, p = 0.39, Poisson regression with White persons as the reference group). MS prevalence is lower in Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander compared to White persons, regardless of sex. MS prevalence is higher in women compared to men across all racial and ethnic groups (White individuals: crude RR 3.09, 95% CI 2.82–3.39, p < 0.0001; Black individuals: crude RR 3.15, 95% CI 2.56–3.88, p < 0.0001; Hispanic individuals: crude RR 2.66, 95% CI 2.23–3.17, p < 0.0001; Asian/Pacific Islander individuals: crude RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.16–7.87, p < 0.0001).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 MS Sex- and Age-Specific Prevalence by Race and Ethnicity in Southern California Crude sex- and age-specific prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) and 95% CIs among White persons (A), Black persons (B), Hispanic persons (C), and the heterogeneous group of Asian/Pacific Islander persons (A/PI; D) residing in Southern California. The female predominance and peak prevalence between 35 and 64 years of age are remarkably similar between White and Black persons. While this pattern is similar in Hispanic persons, the magnitude of increase among Hispanic women and men is significantly lower than for Black or White persons. Among Asian women, prevalence increased from ages 18 to 24 years to 25 to 34 years but no longer after that. MS prevalence was very low among Asian men in all age groups.
Figure 2 MS Sex- and Age-Specific Prevalence by Race and Ethnicity in Southern California Crude sex- and age-specific prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) and 95% CIs among White persons (A), Black persons (B), Hispanic persons (C), and the heterogeneous group of Asian/Pacific Islander persons (A/PI; D) residing in Southern California. The female predominance and peak prevalence between 35 and 64 years of age are remarkably similar between White and Black persons. While this pattern is similar in Hispanic persons, the magnitude of increase among Hispanic women and men is significantly lower than for Black or White persons. Among Asian women, prevalence increased from ages 18 to 24 years to 25 to 34 years but no longer after that. MS prevalence was very low among Asian men in all age groups.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182918cc2 · DOI
  2. US Census Bureau. The chance that two people chosen at random are of different race or ethnicity groups has increased since 2010. Accessed August 19, 2021. census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/2020-united-states-population-more-racially-ethnically-diverse-than-2010.html
  3. 10.1159/000342779 · DOI
  4. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000094316.90240.EB · DOI
  5. Williamson DM, Henry JP, Schiffer R, Wagner L. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in 19 Texas counties, 1998-2000. J Environ Health. 2007;69(10):41-45.
  6. 10.1186/s12883-020-01749-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1352458519864681 · DOI
  8. 10.1159/000504050 · DOI
  9. 10.7812/TPP/12-031 · DOI · Paper page
  10. US Census Bureau. Census 2000 surname list. US Census Bureau; 2009.
  11. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. IARC Scientific Publications; 1987:1-406.
  12. 10.1093/brain/aws099 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1159/000484213 · DOI
  14. 10.1212/WNL.29.9_Part_1.1228 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/2055217317715050 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10072-016-2637-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1159/000484090 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2633 · DOI
  19. Vespa J, Medina L, Armstrong D. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. In: Current Population Reports. US Census Bureau; 2020:P25-1144. Accessed August 19, 2021. census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf
  20. 10.1177/1352458516638746 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s100720170011 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/cjn.2015.36 · DOI
  23. WorldAtlas. Largest ethnic groups in Mexico. 2019. Accessed August 19, 2021. worldatlas.com/articles/largest-ethnic-groups-in-mexico.html.
  24. US Census Bureau. QuickFacts Puerto Rico. 2019. Accessed August 19, 2021. census.gov/quickfacts/PR.
  25. Los Angeles Almanac. Asian ethnic origin Los Angeles County: 2010 Census & 2019 Census estimates.Accessed August 19, 2021. laalmanac.com/population/po16.php
  26. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007035 · DOI
  27. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006583 · DOI
  28. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2711 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Langer-Gould, A. M., Gonzales, E. G., Smith, J. B., Li, B. H., & Nelson, L. M.
Affiliations
Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2022-05-03
Volume
98
Issue
18
Pages
e1818-e1827
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W4225006257
Cited by
123
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 7
FWCI
17.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, racial and ethnic disparities, disease prevalence, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, sex differences, age differences, young adults, Southern California
MeSH terms
Adult, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review