The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Association of Very Early Treatment Initiation With the Risk of Long-term Disability in Patients With a First Demyelinating Event
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early treatment is associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with a first demyelinating event and early multiple sclerosis (MS). However, magnetic resonance (MR) findings are not usually integrated to construct propensity scores (PSs) when evaluating outcomes. We assessed the association of receiving very early treatment with the risk of long-term disability including an MR score (MRS) in patients with a first demyelinating event. METHODS: We included 580 patients with a first demyelinating event prospectively collected between 1994 and 2021, who received at least 1 disease-modifying drug (DMD). Patients were classified into tertiles according to the cohort's distribution of the time from the first demyelinating event to the first DMD: first tertile (FT) or very early treatment (6 months; n = 194), second tertile (6.1-16 months, n = 192), and third tertile (TT) (16.1 months, n = 194). A 5-point MRS was built according to the sum of the following indicators: ≥9 brain lesions (1 point); ≥1 infratentorial lesion (1 point); ≥1 spinal cord (SC) lesion (1 point); ≥1 contrast-enhancing (CE) brain lesion (1 point); and ≥1 CE SC lesion (1 point). PS based on covariates and the MRS was computed for each of the outcomes. Inverse PS-weighted Cox and linear regression models assessed the risk of different outcomes between tertile groups. Finally, to confirm the role of MR in treatment decision, we studied the time elapsed from the first demyelinating event to treatment initiation according to the MRS in all patients with radiologic available information, renamed as raw-MRS. RESULTS: Very early treatment decreased the risk of reaching Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97), secondary progressive MS (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85), and sustained disease progression at 12 months after treatment initiation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.84), when compared with patients from the TT group. Patients from the FT group had a lower disability progression rate (β estimate -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.002) and a lower severe disability measured by the Patient-Determined Disease Step (β estimate -0.52, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.13) than the TT group. Finally, there was a 62.4% reduction in the median time between the first demyelinating event and the first-ever treatment initiation from patients displaying a raw-MRS 1 to patients with a raw-MRS 5. DISCUSSION: Using PS models with and without MRS, we showed that treatment initiation at very early stages is associated with a reduction in the risk of long-term disability accrual in patients with a first demyelinating event. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that earlier treatment of patients with MS presenting with a first demyelinating event is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“earlier diagnosis enables earlier initiation of DMT, which has been consistently associated with improved long-term outcomes like reduced relapse rates or lower disability accrual.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1426 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61259-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458512469695 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003078 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314843 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70262-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70191-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70005-5 · DOI
- 10.1056/nejm200009283431301 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61194-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.21757 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.024 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318360 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.24682 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00018-6 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458514546788 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458516675039 · DOI
- 10.1177/13524585211010128 · DOI
- 10.1111/ene.13692 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2018.20588 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458512449681 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awv105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ene.15422 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.24747 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awaa231 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011242 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.0000000000013016 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012726 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00095-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sim.7084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.060 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103644 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318258f744 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458515599450 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458517751049 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awac016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010135 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4905 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30067-3 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobo-Calvo, A., Tur, C., Otero-Romero, S., Carbonell-Mirabent, P., Ruiz, M., Pappolla, A., Villacieros Alvarez, J., Vidal-Jordana, A., Arrambide, G., Castilló, J., Galan, I., Rodríguez Barranco, M., Midaglia, L. S., Nos, C., Rodriguez Acevedo, B., Zabalza de Torres, A., Mongay, N., Rio, J., Comabella, M., Auger, C., Sastre-Garriga, J., Rovira, A., Tintore, M., & Montalban, X.
- Affiliations
- From the Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) (A.C.-C., C.T., S.O.-R., P.C.-M., A.P., J.V.A., A.V.-J., G.A., J.C., I.G., M.R.B., L.S.M., C.N., B.R.A., A.Z.d.T., N.M., J.R., M.C., J.S.-G., M.T., X.M.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid; and Section of Neuroradiology (C.A., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2023-09-26
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- e1280-e1292
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC10558169
- OpenAlex
- W4384820775
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi
- Biogen
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
- Celgene
- European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
- Mylan
- Bayer HealthCare
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Eisai
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple
- Genentech
- Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI21/01860, JR19/00007, PI20/00800, PI19/01606)
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, first demyelinating event, disease-modifying drugs, long-term disability, Expanded Disability Status Scale, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, disease progression, brain lesions, spinal cord lesions, contrast-enhancing lesions, treatment timing, propensity score weighting, treatment decision-making, relapse rate
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review