Cited by 90Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Changes in MS Diagnostic Criteria Over 25 Years on Time to Treatment and Prognosis in Patients With Clinically Isolated Syndrome

Open access
Tintore, Mar, Cobo-Calvo, Alvaro, Carbonell, Pere, Arrambide, Georgina, Otero-Romero, Susana, Río, Jordi, Tur, Carmen, Comabella, Manuel, Nos, Carlos, Arévalo, María Jesús, Midaglia, Luciana, Galán, Ingrid, Vidal-Jordana, Angela, Castilló, Joaquin, Rodríguez-Acevedo, Breogán, Zabalza de Torres, Ana, Salerno, Annalaura, Auger, Cristina, Sastre-Garriga, Jaume, Rovira, Àlex, Montalban, Xavier·2021·Neurology

Abstract

Background and objectives To explore whether time to diagnosis, time to treatment initiation, and age to reach disability milestones have changed in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) according to different multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria periods. Methods This retrospective study was based on data collected prospectively from the Barcelona-CIS cohort between 1994 and 2020. Patients were classified into 5 periods according to different MS criteria, and the times to MS diagnosis and treatment initiation were evaluated. The age at which patients with MS reached an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression analysis according to diagnostic criteria periods. Last, to remove the classic Will Rogers phenomenon by which the use of different MS criteria over time might result in a changes of prognosis, the 2017 McDonald criteria were applied, and age at EDSS score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression. Results In total, 1,174 patients were included. The median time from CIS to MS diagnosis and from CIS to treatment initiation showed a 77% and 82% reduction from the Poser to the McDonald 2017 diagnostic criteria periods, respectively. Patients of a given age diagnosed in more recent diagnostic criteria periods had a lower risk of reaching an EDSS score ≥3.0 than patients of the same age diagnosed in earlier diagnostic periods (reference category Poser period): adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012726

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1093/brain/awg081 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/brain/112.6.1419 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/ana.24747 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1352458519877810 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00415-018-9074-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1352458518779925 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/brain/awaa145 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0330 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1352458511422097 · DOI
  14. 10.1212/WNL.62.4.601 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/brain/awv105 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/ana.10147 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/brain/awh714 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.067 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/sim.5347 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/ana.21464 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/1352458510396269 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1352458516687402 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.msard.2017.02.010 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/ene.13506 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jns.2012.03.017 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/1352458516681197 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/jama.2018.20588 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Tintore, M., Cobo-Calvo, A., Carbonell, P., Arrambide, G., Otero-Romero, S., Río, J., Tur, C., Comabella, M., Nos, C., Arévalo, M. J., Midaglia, L., Galán, I., Vidal-Jordana, A., Castilló, J., Rodríguez-Acevedo, B., Zabalza de Torres, A., Salerno, A., Auger, C., Sastre-Garriga, J., Rovira, À., & Montalban, X.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., A.C.-C., P.C., G.A., S.O.-R., J.R., C.T., M.C., C.N., M.J.A., L.M., I.G., A.V.-J., J.C., B.R.-A., A.Z., J.S.-G., X.M.) Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), and Department of Radiology (IDI) (A.S., C.A., À.R.), Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2021-10-26
Volume
97
Issue
17
Pages
e1641-e1652
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W3201411969
Cited by
90
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DRYAD (public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, McDonald criteria, Poser criteria, time to diagnosis, time to treatment, Expanded Disability Status Scale, disability progression, prognosis, Will Rogers phenomenon, disease-modifying therapy, early treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Demyelinating Diseases, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Retrospective Studies, Spain, Disease Progression, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review