Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraepidermal nerve fiber density and its application in sarcoidosis

Open access
Bakkers, M., Merkies, I.S.J., Lauria, G., Devigili, G., Penza, P., Lombardi, R., Hermans, M. C.E., van Nes, S. I., De Baets, M., Faber, C. G.·2009·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) is considered a good diagnostic tool for small fiber neuropathy (SFN). OBJECTIVES: To assess stratified normative values for IENFD and determine the reliability and validity of IENFD in sarcoidosis. METHODS: IENFD was assessed in 188 healthy volunteers and 72 patients with sarcoidosis (n = 58 with SFN symptoms, n = 14 without SFN symptoms). Healthy controls were stratified (for age and sex), resulting in 6 age groups (20-29, 30-39, ... up to > or = 70 years) containing at least 15 men and 15 women. A skin biopsy was taken in each participant 10 cm above the lateral malleolus and analyzed in accordance with the international guidelines using bright-field microscopy. Interobserver/intraobserver reliability of IENFD was examined. In the patients, a symptoms inventory questionnaire (SIQ; assessing SFN symptoms) and the Vickrey Peripheral Neuropathy Quality-of-Life Instrument-97 (PNQoL-97) were assessed to examine the discriminative ability of normative IENFD values. RESULTS: There was a significant age-dependent decrease of IENFD values in healthy controls, with lower densities in men compared with women. Good interobserver/intraobserver reliability scores were obtained (kappa values > or = 0.90). A total of 21 patients with sarcoidosis had a reduced IENFD score (< 5th percentile; 19 [32.8%] in patients with SFN symptoms, 2 [14.3%] in patients without SFN symptoms). The validity of the normative IENFD values was demonstrated by distinguishing between the SIQ scores and various PNQoL-97 values for the different patient groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides clinically applicable distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density normative values, showing age- and sex-related differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181bacf05

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Bakkers, M., Merkies, I. S. J., Lauria, G., Devigili, G., Penza, P., Lombardi, R., Hermans, M. C. E., van Nes, S. I., De Baets, M., & Faber, C. G.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-10-06
Volume
73
Issue
14
Pages
1142-1148
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2052863031
Cited by
250
References
3
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density and its application in sarcoidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181bacf05
The paper
Bakkers, M., Merkies, I. S. J., Lauria, G., Devigili, G., Penza, P., Lombardi, R., Hermans, M. C. E., van Nes, S. I., De Baets, M., & Faber, C. G. (2009). Intraepidermal nerve fiber density and its application in sarcoidosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181bacf05

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.