Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibodies to metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the Ophelia syndrome

Open access
Lancaster, E., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Titulaer, M.J., Boulos, M., Weaver, S., Antoine, J.-C., Liebers, E., Kornblum, C., Bien, C.G., Honnorat, J., Wong, S., Xu, J., Contractor, A., Balice-Gordon, R., Dalmau, J.·2011·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) as the autoantigen of antibodies from 2 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and limbic encephalopathy (Ophelia syndrome). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry with brain tissue and cultures of rat hippocampal neurons were used to demonstrate antibodies. Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry, and mGluR5-null mice served to identify the antigen. HEK293 cells transfected with mGluR5 or mGluR1 were used to determine immunologic crossreactivity. RESULTS: Both patients developed symptoms consistent with limbic encephalopathy; one had MRI findings typical of this disorder and the other had more extensive radiologic involvement, including parietal and occipital cortex. Patients' sera had antibodies that predominantly reacted with the neuropil of hippocampus and cell surface of live hippocampal neurons. Immunoprecipitation from cultured neurons and mass spectrometry demonstrated that the antigen was mGluR5, a receptor involved in processes of learning and memory. The reactivity of patients' sera was abrogated in brain of mGluR5-null mice, further confirming the antibody specificity. Studies with a large number of controls including 2 patients with cerebellar ataxia and mGluR1 antibodies showed that mGluR5 was only identified by sera of the 2 patients with the Ophelia syndrome, and that despite the homology of this receptor with mGluR1 each autoantigen was specific for a distinct syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to mGluR5 should be considered in patients with symptoms of limbic encephalitis and HL (Ophelia syndrome). Recognition of this disorder is important because it can affect young individuals and is reversible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182364a44

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Lancaster, E., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Titulaer, M. J., Boulos, M., Weaver, S., Antoine, J.-C., Liebers, E., Kornblum, C., Bien, C. G., Honnorat, J., Wong, S., Xu, J., Contractor, A., Balice-Gordon, R., & Dalmau, J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-11
Volume
77
Issue
18
Pages
1698-1701
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2009224548
Cited by
359
References
0
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibodies to metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the Ophelia syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182364a44
The paper
Lancaster, E., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Titulaer, M. J., Boulos, M., Weaver, S., Antoine, J.-C., Liebers, E., Kornblum, C., Bien, C. G., Honnorat, J., Wong, S., Xu, J., Contractor, A., Balice-Gordon, R., & Dalmau, J. (2011). Antibodies to metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the Ophelia syndrome. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182364a44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.