The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To address the need for brief, reliable, valid, and standardized quality of life (QOL) assessment applicable across neurologic conditions. METHODS: Drawing from larger calibrated item banks, we developed short measures (8-9 items each) of 13 different QOL domains across physical, mental, and social health and evaluated their validity and reliability. Three samples were utilized during short form development: general population (Internet-based, n = 2,113); clinical panel (Internet-based, n = 553); and clinical outpatient (clinic-based, n = 581). All short forms are expressed as T scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10. RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the 13 short forms ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. Correlations between short form and full-length item bank scores ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 (0.82-0.96 after removing common items from banks). Online respondents were asked whether they had any of 19 different chronic health conditions, and whether or not those reported conditions interfered with ability to function normally. All short forms, across physical, mental, and social health, were able to separate people who reported no health condition from those who reported 1-2 or 3 or more. In addition, scores on all 13 domains were worse for people who acknowledged being limited by the health conditions they reported, compared to those who reported conditions but were not limited by them. CONCLUSION: These 13 brief measures of self-reported QOL are reliable and show preliminary evidence of concurrent validity inasmuch as they differentiate people based upon number of reported health conditions and whether those reported conditions impede normal function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan
Lin, J. J., Mula, M., & Hermann, B. P. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61455-x · Cited by 435
Stockdale, L., & Coyne, S. M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.045 · Cited by 214
Paulsen, J. S., Nance, M., Kim, J.-I., Carlozzi, N. E., Panegyres, P. K., Erwin, C., Goh, A., McCusker, E., & Williams, J. K. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.003 · Cited by 168
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Acute Stroke: Rationale, Methods and Future Directions
Reeves, M., Lisabeth, L., Williams, L., Katzan, I., Kapral, M., Deutsch, A., & Prvu-Bettger, J. (2018) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.117.018912 · Cited by 147
Kratz, A. L., Murphy, S. L., & Braley, T. J. (2017) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.002 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Cella, D., Lai, J.-S., Nowinski, C. J., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavazos, J. E., Reder, A. T., Sufit, R., Simuni, T., Holmes, G. L., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., Wortman, K., Choi, S., Gershon, R., Rothrock, N., & Moy, C.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2012-06-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1860-1867
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1985265957
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e318258f744
- The paper
- Cella, D., Lai, J.-S., Nowinski, C. J., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavazos, J. E., Reder, A. T., Sufit, R., Simuni, T., Holmes, G. L., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., . . . Moy, C. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e318258f744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.