Cited by 214Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Video game addiction in emerging adulthood: Cross-sectional evidence of pathology in video game addicts as compared to matched healthy controls

Stockdale, Laura, Coyne, Sarah M.·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (IGDS) is a widely used measure of video game addiction, a pathology affecting a small percentage of all people who play video games. Emerging adult males are significantly more likely to be video game addicts. Few researchers have examined how people who qualify as video game addicts based on the IGDS compared to matched controls based on age, gender, race, and marital status.Method The current study compared IGDS video game addicts to matched non-addicts in terms of their mental, physical, social-emotional health using self-report, survey methods.Results Addicts had poorer mental health and cognitive functioning including poorer impulse control and ADHD symptoms compared to controls. Additionally, addicts displayed increased emotional difficulties including increased depression and anxiety, felt more socially isolated, and were more likely to display internet pornography pathological use symptoms. Female video game addicts were at unique risk for negative outcomes.Limitations The sample for this study was undergraduate college students and self-report measures were used.Conclusions Participants who met the IGDS criteria for video game addiction displayed poorer emotional, physical, mental, and social health, adding to the growing evidence that video game addictions are a valid phenomenon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.045

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockdale, L., & Coyne, S. M.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Stockdale, Laura
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
225
Pages
265-272
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748841200
Cited by
214
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
40.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Loyola University Office of the Provost
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
gaming addiction, Internet Gaming Disorder Scale, emerging adulthood, mental health, depression, anxiety, social isolation, impulse control, ADHD symptoms, cognitive function, gender differences, university students
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Reference Values, Students, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Internet, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review