Cited by 214Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromePeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis

Sinnecker, Tim, Dörr, Jan, Pfueller, Caspar F., Harms, Lutz, Ruprecht, Klemens, Jarius, Sven, Brück, Wolfgang, Niendorf, Thoralf +2 more·2012·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To investigate distinct white matter and cortical gray matter pathology in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) and multiple sclerosis (MS) at 7-T MRI in a cross-sectional study. Methods We included 10 patients with NMOSDs and 18 patients with MS in our 7-T MRI study. The imaging protocol comprised T2*-weighted fast low angle shot and turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequences. White matter and cortical gray matter lesions were assessed with special regard to their (perivascular) localization as well as the expression of a hypointense rim. Results In total, we detected 140 white matter lesions in 7 of 10 patients with NMOSDs. In contrast to MS plaques, which were nearly exclusively centered by a small vein (92%) and showed a characteristic hypointense rim (23%), white matter changes in patients with NMOSDs were nonspecific in appearance and were only infrequently neighbored by a blood vessel (49 lesions [35%], p = 0.003). Hypointense rims were very rarely detectable (3 lesions [2%], p Conclusion The MRI features of white matter and the absence of cortical gray matter findings substantially differentiate NMOSDs from MS and can be used as a potential marker to distinguish these 2 entities. The fact that cortical pathology is common in MS but is not present in patients with NMOSDs may reflect the difference in the underlying pathogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182648bc8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinnecker, T., Dörr, J., Pfueller, C. F., Harms, L., Ruprecht, K., Jarius, S., Brück, W., Niendorf, T., Wuerfel, J., & Paul, F.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2012-08-14
Volume
79
Issue
7
Pages
708-714
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2148991512
Cited by
214
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bayer Vital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, multiple sclerosis, 7T MRI, high-field MRI, white matter lesions, perivascular localization, differential diagnosis, intracortical lesions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neuromyelitis Optica, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review