Cited by 141Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infectious burden and cognitive function: The Northern Manhattan Study

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that infectious burden (IB), a composite serologic measure of exposure to common pathogens (i.e., Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus 1 and 2) associated with vascular risk in the prospective Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS), would also be associated with cognition. METHODS: Cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at enrollment and the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) at annual follow-up visits. Adjusted linear and logistic regressions were used to measure the association between IB index and MMSE. Generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate associations with TICS-m and its change over time. RESULTS: Serologies and cognitive assessments were available in 1,625 participants of the NOMAS cohort. In unadjusted analyses, higher IB index was associated with worse cognition (change per standard deviation [SD] of IB for MMSE was -0.77, p < 0.0001, and for first measurements of TICS-m was -1.89, p < 0.0001). These effects were attenuated after adjusting for risk factors (for MMSE adjusted change per SD of IB = -0.17, p = 0.06, for TICS-m adjusted change per SD IB = -0.68, p < 0.0001). IB was associated with MMSE ≤24 (compared to MMSE >24, adjusted odds ratio 1.26 per SD of IB, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.51). IB was not associated with cognitive decline over time. The results were similar when IB was limited to viral serologies only. CONCLUSION: A measure of IB associated with stroke risk and atherosclerosis was independently associated with cognitive performance in this multiethnic cohort. Past infections may contribute to cognitive impairment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182896e79

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 141

Metadata

Authors
Katan, M., Moon, Y. P., Paik, M. C., Sacco, R. L., Wright, C. B., & Elkind, M. S. V.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Neurology (M.K., Y.P.M., M.S.V.E.) and Department of Epidemiology and Gertrude Sergievsky Center (M.S.V.E.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; Department of Biostatistics (M.C.P.), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; and Departments of Neurology, Epidemiology &amp; Public Health, and Neuroscience (R.L.S., C.B.W.), and Department of Genetics (R.L.S.), Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-03-26
Volume
80
Issue
13
Pages
1209-1215
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2017987395
Cited by
141
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • American Heart Association
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Fondation Leducq
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (29993, 130982)
  • National Institutes of Health (R37 NS29993)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL108623)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS048134, R37NS029993, R01NS48134, R37 NS 29993., K02NS059729)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
infectious burden, cognitive function, cognitive impairment, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, vascular risk, cognitive decline, stroke risk, atherosclerosis, Northern Manhattan Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Infections, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review