Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review

Open access
Tsai, Chung-Fen, Thomas, Brenda, Sudlow, Cathie L.M.·2013·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically assess the evidence for differences in the incidence of stroke and distribution of its subtypes in Chinese compared with white populations. METHODS: We comprehensively sought studies conducted since 1990 in Chinese populations of 1) first-ever stroke incidence (community-based studies only), and 2) pathologic types/subtypes of stroke (hospital- or community-based studies of first-ever or recurrent strokes). We identified community-based studies in white populations from a recent systematic review. For each study, we calculated age-standardized stroke incidence and the proportions of each pathologic type and ischemic subtype, using random-effects meta-analysis to pool proportions of stroke types/subtypes in Chinese and in white populations. RESULTS: Age-standardized annual first-ever stroke incidence in community-based studies was higher among Chinese than white populations (for ages 45-74 years, range 205-584 vs 170-335 per 100,000, respectively). Intracerebral hemorrhage accounted for a larger, more variable proportion of strokes in China than Taiwan (range 27%-51% vs 17%-28%), in Chinese community-based than hospital-based studies (27%-51% vs 17%-30%), and in community-based Chinese than white studies (pooled proportion 33% vs 12%). Although the overall proportion of lacunar ischemic stroke appeared higher in Chinese than white populations, variable study methodologies precluded reliable comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for a slightly higher overall stroke incidence and higher proportion of intracerebral hemorrhage in Chinese vs white populations, but no clear evidence for different distributions of ischemic stroke subtypes. Studies using comparable, population-based case ascertainment and similar classification methods are needed to address this.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31829bfde3

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Tsai, C.-F., Thomas, B., & Sudlow, C. L. M.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-07-16
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
264-272
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2057552504
Cited by
462
References
29
FWCI
25.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31829bfde3
The paper
Tsai, C.-F., Thomas, B., & Sudlow, C. L. M. (2013). Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31829bfde3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.