The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically assess the evidence for differences in the incidence of stroke and distribution of its subtypes in Chinese compared with white populations. METHODS: We comprehensively sought studies conducted since 1990 in Chinese populations of 1) first-ever stroke incidence (community-based studies only), and 2) pathologic types/subtypes of stroke (hospital- or community-based studies of first-ever or recurrent strokes). We identified community-based studies in white populations from a recent systematic review. For each study, we calculated age-standardized stroke incidence and the proportions of each pathologic type and ischemic subtype, using random-effects meta-analysis to pool proportions of stroke types/subtypes in Chinese and in white populations. RESULTS: Age-standardized annual first-ever stroke incidence in community-based studies was higher among Chinese than white populations (for ages 45-74 years, range 205-584 vs 170-335 per 100,000, respectively). Intracerebral hemorrhage accounted for a larger, more variable proportion of strokes in China than Taiwan (range 27%-51% vs 17%-28%), in Chinese community-based than hospital-based studies (27%-51% vs 17%-30%), and in community-based Chinese than white studies (pooled proportion 33% vs 12%). Although the overall proportion of lacunar ischemic stroke appeared higher in Chinese than white populations, variable study methodologies precluded reliable comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for a slightly higher overall stroke incidence and higher proportion of intracerebral hemorrhage in Chinese vs white populations, but no clear evidence for different distributions of ischemic stroke subtypes. Studies using comparable, population-based case ascertainment and similar classification methods are needed to address this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, H. P., Bendixen, B. H., Kappelle, L. J., Biller, J., Love, B. B., Gordon, D. L., & Marsh, E. E. (1993) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.24.1.35 · Cited by 12,335
Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · Cited by 11,386
Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Warlow, C., & Burn, J. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o · Cited by 3,294
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., Barker-Collo, S. L., & Parag, V. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70025-0 · Cited by 2,855
van Asch, C. J., Luitse, M. J., Rinkel, G. J., van der Tweel, I., Algra, A., & Klijn, C. J. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70340-0 · Cited by 2,658
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., & Anderson, C. S. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7 · Cited by 1,932 · cited 1×
“However, reliable comparisons have been precluded by a lack of methodologically robust studies of stroke incidence among Chinese populations, age standardization of incidence rates in different studies to different standard populations, and variable methods for classifying stroke types and subtypes.(9,10) Furthermore,”
BackgroundAGE STANDARDIZATION OF RATES: A NEW WHO STANDARD
Ahmad, O. B., Boschi-Pinto, C., López, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., Lozano, R., & Inoue, M. (2000) · Cited by 1,794
Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report.
Hatano, S. (1976) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,526
Johnston, S. C., Mendis, S., & Mathers, C. D. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70023-7 · Cited by 977
Cited by
Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy
Collins, R., Reith, C., Emberson, J., Armitage, J., Baigent, C., Blackwell, L., Blumenthal, R., Danesh, J., Smith, G. D., DeMets, D., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31357-5 · Cited by 1,857
Update on cerebral small vessel disease: a dynamic whole-brain disease
Shi, Y., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2016) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2016-000035 · Cited by 459
The pathology and pathophysiology of vascular dementia
Kalaria, R. N. (2018) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.030 · Cited by 339
Ischaemic stroke in young adults: a global perspective
Boot, E., Ekker, M. S., Putaala, J., Kittner, S., De Leeuw, F.-E., & Tuladhar, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-322424 · Cited by 284
Blood pressure management in early ischemic stroke
Saver, J. L. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282544 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, C.-F., Thomas, B., & Sudlow, C. L. M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2013-07-16
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-272
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2057552504
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 25.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31829bfde3
- The paper
- Tsai, C.-F., Thomas, B., & Sudlow, C. L. M. (2013). Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: A systematic review. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31829bfde3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.