The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frontal lobe neglect in man
Abstract
American Academy of Neurology Dedicated to advancing the art and science of neurology, and thereby promoting the best possible care for patients with neurological disorders A Celebration of the First 50 Years of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 1972;22:660-664 █ My hypothesis is that the frontal lobes are the seat of coordination and fusion of the incoming and outgoing products of the several sensory and motor areas of the cortex. Bianchi (1895)1 made this hypothesis after excising the frontal lobes in animals and observing rotary movements to the side of the lesion and a visual disturbance that appeared as a contralateral hemianopia. Kennard2 showed that there was also a loss of cutaneous sensitivity in these animals, and Kennard and Ectors3 proposed that the visual defect was more a hemianopia in which an object is disregarded than a true hemianopia. Welch and Stuteville4 found that with lesions of the posterior part of the superior limb of the arcuate sulcus, their monkeys had unilateral neglect to all sensory modalities tested. Although many investigators have produced and described frontal neglect in monkeys, unilateral frontal neglect has not been described in man other than in the two cases of pseudohemianopia described by Halstead5 and Thiebaut.6 The purpose of this study was to assess patients with frontal lobe lesions to establish the presence of unilateral neglect-hemispatial agnosia, inattention, and extinction to simultaneous stimuli-and to relate these findings to other known phenomena attributed to frontal lobe disease. Patients admitted to the University of Florida Teaching Hospital or Boston City Hospital during 1969 and 1970 who demonstrated lesions confined to the frontal lobes, as demonstrated by brain scan or postmortem examination, were included in this series. Six cases of unilateral neglect were uncovered (seetable). The anatomic loci of the …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498
Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex
Ungerleider, S. K. A. L. G. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 · Cited by 2,159
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
A PET study of visuospatial attention
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F., Shulman, G., & Petersen, S. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-03-01202.1993 · Cited by 1,520
Metadata
- Authors
- Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1972-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 660-660
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2017050575
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontal lobe neglect in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.22.6.660
- The paper
- Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1972). Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.22.6.660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.