Cited by 70Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Associative visual agnosia without alexia

ALBERT, MARTIN L., RECHES, AVINOAM, SILVERBERG, RUTH·1975·Neurology

Abstract

A brain-damaged man was unable to appreciate the nature of objects and meaningful nonverbal symbols presented visually, although he could see, draw, describe, and match these stimuli. He had no difficulty understanding visually presented words. Auditory and tactile recognition of both verbal and nonverbal stimuli were normal. Our findings provide evidence that two neuropsychologic mechanisms were responsible for this disorder. One was an interhemispheric visual-verbal disconnection; the other was a specific categorization defect for visual, nonverba, meaningful stimuli. Neither mechanism alone was sufficient; both were necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.25.4.322

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • P&D's hypothesis that reading is more complex and imposes greater demands on visual processing is not sufficiently articulate to account for double dissociations such as object agnosia without alexia or prosopagnosia without alexia.

    “is not sufficiently articulate to account for double dissociations such as object agnosia without alexia (Albert et al., 1975; Gomori and Hawryluk, 1984) or prosopagnosia without alexia (e.g. McNeil and Warrington, 1993).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 1975

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALBERT, M. L., RECHES, A., & SILVERBERG, R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1975-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
322-322
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2031740952
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
alexia, interhemispheric disconnection, object recognition, nonverbal symbols, visual perception, brain damage
MeSH terms
Agnosia, Association, Auditory Perception, Brain Damage, Chronic, Confusion, Dyslexia, Acquired, Electroencephalography, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychological Tests, Syndrome, Touch, Visual Fields, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review