The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assumptions in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma
Abstract
In the light of advances in computerized tomography (CT), we have retrospectively evaluated the assumptions that underlie the radiation therapy of glioblastoma: (1) No neuroradiologic technique provides an accurate delineation of tumor bulk and location, (2) glioblastoma is commonly multicentric, and (3) a major source of therapeutic failure is recurrence beyond radiotherapy fields. 1. CT scans, performed on glioblastoma patients within 2 months of postmortem examination, defined both gross and microscopic tumor extent (within a 2-cm margin) in all but 6 of 35 patients evaluated. The major source of error was subependymal spread (four patients). 2. Multicentricity occurred in only 4% of untreated and 6% of treated (radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy) patients. All multicentric lesions were identified on CT scans. 3. Serial CT scans on 42 patients revealed that glioblastoma recurred within a 2-cm margin of the primary site in 90%. Occurrences outside this margin were accurately delineated by CT in all instances. Because most patients show recurrence within or in close proximity to the original site, current radiation doses would appear to be inadequate for therapy of the primary tumor. CT scan accuracy may permit smaller-field and higher-dose irradiation therapy for glioblastoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wen, P. Y., & Kesari, S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708126 · Cited by 3,511
Experimental Therapy of Human Glioma by Means of a Genetically Engineered Virus Mutant
Martuza, R. L., Malick, A., Markert, J. M., Ruffner, K. L., & Coen, D. M. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1851332 · Cited by 1,050
Kioi, M., Vogel, H., Schultz, G., Hoffman, R. M., Harsh, G. R., & Brown, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci40283 · Cited by 773
Minniti, G., Amelio, D., Amichetti, M., Salvati, M., Muni, R., Bozzao, A., Lanzetta, G., Scarpino, S., Arcella, A., & Enrici, R. M. (2010) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.020 · Cited by 323
Sarkaria, J. N., Carlson, B. L., Schroeder, M. A., Grogan, P., Brown, P. D., Giannini, C., Ballman, K. V., Kitange, G. J., Guha, A., Pandita, A., et al. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2510 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Hochberg, F. H., & Pruitt, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 907-907
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2088454377
- Cited by
- 992
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assumptions in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.30.9.907
- The paper
- Hochberg, F. H., & Pruitt, A. (1980). Assumptions in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.30.9.907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.