The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: Design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests
Abstract
A cross-sectional survey and subsequent longitudinal study among diabetic residents of Rochester, MN--The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study (RDNS)--is population-based and uses quantitative, validated, and unique end points to detect, classify, and stage neuropathy. Nondiabetic persons, drawn from the same population, serve as controls. For patients 10 to 70 years old, the RDNS cohort is representative of diabetics living in Rochester, MN. We assessed reproducibility of tests used to characterize and quantitate severity of neuropathy in 20 diabetic subjects without neuropathy and with varying severities of neuropathy. Using intraclass correlation coefficient (rI) as a measure of test reproducibility, we found high rI (usually 0.9 or better) with small confidence intervals for the Neurologic Disability Score (NDS); weakness subset of NDS (W-NDS); vibratory and cooling detection thresholds (using computer-assisted sensory examination [CASE] IV); compound muscle action potentials; sensory nerve action potentials; and motor nerve conduction velocities. There was good agreement among three trained observers for NDS and the W-NDS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Macleod, A. F., Williams, D. R. R., & Sonksen, P. H. (1993) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00400697 · Cited by 1,502
Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density: Normative Reference Range and Diagnostic Efficiency
McArthur, J. C., Stocks, E. A., Hauer, P., Cornblath, D. R., & Griffin, J. W. (1998) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.55.12.1513 · Cited by 560
Vinik, A. I., Park, T. S., Stansberry, K. B., & Pittenger, G. L. (2000) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250051477 · Cited by 489
Olaleye, D., Perkins, B. A., & Bril, V. (2001) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00278-9 · Cited by 158
Sudden cardiac death in diabetes mellitus: risk factors in the Rochester diabetic neuropathy study
Suarez, G. A. (2005) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.039339 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyck, P. J., Kratz, K. M., Lehman, K. A., Karnes, J. L., Melton, L. J., O'Brien, P. C., Litchy, W. J., Windebank, A. J., Smith, B. E., Low, P. A., Service, F. J., Rizza, R. A., & Zimmerman, B. R.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 799-799
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1991876073
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: Design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.41.6.799
- The paper
- Dyck, P. J., Kratz, K. M., Lehman, K. A., Karnes, J. L., Melton, L. J., O'Brien, P. C., Litchy, W. J., Windebank, A. J., Smith, B. E., Low, P. A., Service, F. J., Rizza, R. A., & Zimmerman, B. R. (1991). The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: Design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.41.6.799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.