Cited by 560Hereditary Neurological DisordersPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density: Normative Reference Range and Diagnostic Efficiency

McArthur, Justin C., Stocks, E. Adelaine, Hauer, Peter, Cornblath, David R., Griffin, John W.·1998·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of neuron-specific antibodies permit the identification of the small unmyelinated nerve fibers within the skin. OBJECTIVES: To develop a reference range of epidermal nerve fiber density in humans, and to evaluate their diagnostic efficiency for sensory neuropathies. METHODS: Ninety-eight normal controls (age range, 13-82 years) were examined with both directed neurologic examinations and quantitative sensory testing. The diagnostic utility was examined in 20 patients with sensory neuropathies. Each subject had 2 punch biopsies performed at each site in the thigh and distal part of the leg (total of 392 biopsies). After formalin fixation, 50-microm-thick free-floating sections were stained with a polyclonal antibody to neuron-specific ubiquitin hydrolase, anti-protein gene product 9.5. We enumerated intraepidermal nerve fibers per millimeter to derive a "linear density." The linear density technique was validated against a stereological technique that used the fractionator to measure the total length of intraepidermal nerve fibers per 3-mm punch. RESULTS: The biopsy technique was well tolerated, with no notable complications. The linear density quantitation was rapid and had high intraobserver and interobserver reliability. We determined that the density of intraepidermal fibers in normal controls was 21.1+/-10.4 per millimeter (mean +/- SD) in the thigh (fifth percentile, 5.2 per millimeter), and was 13.8+/-6.7 per millimeter at the distal part of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.55.12.1513

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors' normative values for IENFD are based merely on one standard deviation from the mean, and published studies reported similar or higher cut-off values.

    “Our normative values for IENFD are already based merely on one standard deviation from the mean, considering that published studies addressing normative values for IENFD reported similar or even higher cut-off values.19,24,29”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McArthur, J. C., Stocks, E. A., Hauer, P., Cornblath, D. R., & Griffin, J. W.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
1513
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024864390
Cited by
560
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns014784-18)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS026643, NS 14784, NS 26643)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000722, RR00722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
epidermal nerve fiber density, intraepidermal nerve fibers, sensory neuropathy, quantitative sensory testing, reference values, diagnostic accuracy, proximal-distal gradient, skin biopsy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, neuropathic pain
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Axons, Biopsy, Cell Count, Epidermis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review