The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: A quantitative review
Abstract
Knowledge of the recurrence risk following a first unprovoked seizure and the predictors of that risk are necessary for rational treatment decisions. Published estimates of recurrence risk range from 23% to 71%. In a meta-analysis of 16 reports, three methodologic factors explained much of the reported variation: (1) study inclusion criteria, ie, whether patients were enrolled at the time of their first seizure or if patients with prior seizures were included; (2) retrospective versus prospective ascertainment of patients; (3) the interval between the first seizure and the time at which risk was assessed. The average recurrence risk across the 16 studies was 51%. The risk was 40% and 52% in prospective and retrospective studies that employed first-seizure methods and 67% in non-first seizure studies. At or near 2 years following the first seizure, the recurrence risk was 36% and 47% in prospective and retrospective first-seizure studies. The distribution of prognostic factors was also important. Seizure etiology and the EEG were the strongest predictors of recurrence distinguishing between patient subgroups, with recurrence risks as low as 24% and as high as 65%. Partial seizures were associated with an increased recurrence risk, but not consistently. There is considerable agreement among studies concerning the recurrence risk following a first seizure, and much of the discrepancies among studies can be explained by differences in study methods and distributions of important prognostic factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy
Fisher, R. S., Acevedo, C., Arzimanoglou, A., Bogacz, A., Cross, J. H., Elger, C. E., Engel, J., Forsgren, L., French, J. A., Glynn, M., et al. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12550 · Cited by 6,108
Beghi, E. (2020) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000503831 · Cited by 1,452
Marson, A., Jacoby, A., Johnson, A., Kim, L., Gamble, C., & Chadwick, D. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66694-9 · Cited by 438
Krumholz, A., Wiebe, S., Gronseth, G. S., Gloss, D. S., Sanchez, A. M., Kabir, A. A., Liferidge, A. T., Martello, J. P., Kanner, A. M., Shinnar, S., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001487 · Cited by 343
Self-citationKim, L. G., Johnson, T. L., Marson, A. G., & Chadwick, D. W. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70383-0 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, A. T., & Shinnar, S.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 965-965
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2164610714
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: A quantitative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.41.7.965
- The paper
- Berg, A. T., & Shinnar, S. (1991). The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: A quantitative review. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.41.7.965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.