Cited by 145Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of age-related changes in the brains of individuals with Down’s syndrome

Kesslak, J. P., Nagata, S. F., Lott, I., Nalcioglu, O.·1994·Neurology

Abstract

Neuroanatomic characteristics of the brains of individuals with Down's syndrome (DS) are typically characterized at autopsy. Apparent anatomic differences in brain between DS and normal individuals are observable upon gross inspection of MRIs. Area measurements from coronal MRIs are used in this study to determine quantitative structural differences that may occur in DS and during aging. In DS individuals, a significantly larger parahippocampal gyrus, and smaller hippocampus and neocortex, are reported relative to age-matched controls. We also examine two DS individuals with a clinical diagnosis of dementia who exhibit atrophy similar to that typically observed in Alzheimer's disease. MRI appears to be a useful tool for quantitative anatomic analysis and may be beneficial for determining baseline anatomic measures that can be useful in the diagnosis of changes associated with dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.44.6.1039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regions of disproportionately small brain volume in DS include the cerebrum, cerebellum, and hippocampus.

    “Cognitive impairment is a hallmark DS phenotype affecting all individuals with Ts21 (Antonarakis et al., 2020) with regions of disproportionately small brain volume including the cerebrum, cerebellum, and hippocampus (Aylward et al., 1999; Kesslak et al., 1994; Pinter et al., 2001; Raz et al., 1995; Weis et al., 1991).”
  • The cerebral cortical hemispheres, cerebellum, and hippocampal formations are significantly reduced in size in people with Down syndrome.

    “In particular, the cerebral cortical hemispheres, cerebellum, and hippocampal formations are significantly reduced in size (Wisniewski, 1990; Golden and Hyman, 1994; Kesslak et al., 1994; Raz et al., 1995; Pinter et al., 2001; Tarui et al., 2020; McCann et al., 2021).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Kesslak et al., 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesslak, J. P., Nagata, S. F., Lott, I., & Nalcioglu, O.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1994-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1039
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2148368136
Cited by
145
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (NIA AG 05142)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, brain aging, parahippocampal gyrus, hippocampus, neocortex, brain atrophy, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Down Syndrome, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review