Cited by 45Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Longitudinal neuroanatomical and behavioral analyses show phenotypic drift and variability in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome.

Open access
Shaw, Patricia R., Klein, Jenny A., Aziz, Nadine M., Haydar, Tarik F.·2020·Disease Models & Mechanisms

Abstract

Mouse models of Down syndrome (DS) have been invaluable tools for advancing knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of intellectual disability in people with DS. The Ts(1716)65Dn (Ts65Dn) mouse is one of the most commonly used models as it recapitulates many of the phenotypes seen in individuals with DS, including neuroanatomical changes and impaired learning and memory. In this study, we use rigorous metrics to evaluate multiple cohorts of Ts65Dn ranging from 2014 to the present, including a stock of animals recovered from embryos frozen within ten generations after the colony was first created in 2010. Through quantification of prenatal and postnatal brain development and several behavioral tasks, our results provide a comprehensive comparison of Ts65Dn across time and show a significant amount of variability both across cohorts as well as within cohorts. The inconsistent phenotypes in Ts65Dn mice highlight specific cautions and caveats for use of this model. We outline important steps for ensuring responsible use of Ts65Dn in future research. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dmm.046243

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Ts65Dn, the number of actively proliferating cells in the germinal zone of the dorsal telencephalon is decreased and this deficit persists postnatally, with fewer proliferating cells being found in the hippocampus.

    “In concert, the number of actively proliferating cells in the germinal zone of the dorsal telencephalon is decreased (Aziz et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2020) and this deficit persists postnatally, with fewer proliferating cells being found in the hippocampus (Contestabile et al., 2007).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al., 2020

    The Results section (‘Cellular changes underlying the 5252Cryo2010 pallial thickness phenotype’; page unavailable) reports fewer mitotic cells in the subventricular zone of 5252Cryo2010 Ts65Dn embryos at E13.5. It also reports increased mitotic cells in that zone in a different Ts65Dn cohort at later embryonic ages, so the unqualified statement about Ts65Dn overgeneralizes the finding. The postnatal hippocampal clause is attributed to Contestabile et al., not Shaw et al., and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a recent comparison of cohorts of Ts65Dn animals spanning from 2010 to 2019, neither decreases in neuronal density in the cerebellum or hippocampus nor embryonic cortical size differences were measured.

    “In a recent comparison of cohorts of Ts65Dn animals spanning from 2010 to 2019, neither decreases in neuronal density in the cerebellum or hippocampus nor embryonic cortical size differences were measured (Shaw et al., 2020).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al., 2020

    The Results section, “Hippocampal and cerebellar cell densities” (page not provided), reports no decreased neuronal density in the three cohorts studied. But “Embryonic gross anatomical measurements” and “Embryonic pallial thickness measurements” report significant cortical size differences in some cohorts, including reduced pallial thickness in 5252Cryo2010 embryos. The claim’s assertion about embryonic cortical size differences is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many phenotypes described in Ts65Dn are susceptible to phenotypic drift and are variable between cohorts.

    “However, many of the phenotypes that have been described in Ts65Dn have recently been found to be susceptible to phenotypic drift and are variable between cohorts (Shaw et al., 2020).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al., 2020

  • These recapitulated phenotypes appear to be subject to phenotypic drift.

    “However, these recapitulated phenotypes appear to be subject to phenotypic drift.”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al., 2020

  • Behaviorally, Ts65Dn appears to capture many of the features of Down syndrome including developmental delays and learning and memory deficits.

    “Behaviorally, Ts65Dn appears to capture many of the features of DS including developmental delays and learning and memory deficits (Reeves et al., 1995; Olmos-Serrano et al., 2016b; Shaw et al., 2020).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lejeune J., Gautier M. and Turpin R. (1959). Etude des chromosomes somatiques de neuf enfants mongoliens. C R Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 248, 1721- 1722. 13639368

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, P. R., Klein, J. A., Aziz, N. M., & Haydar, T. F.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Haydar, Tarik F.
Venue
Disease Models & Mechanisms
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-8411
OpenAlex
W3049706505
Cited by
45
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NS076503)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Ts65Dn mouse model, Down syndrome, mouse model, phenotypic drift, brain development, neuroanatomy, learning and memory, behavioral phenotypes, longitudinal cohort comparison
MeSH terms
Morris Water Maze Test, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cell Count, Cerebellum, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Hindlimb, Hippocampus, Longevity, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Myelin Sheath, Oligodendroglia, Organ Size, Phenotype, Reflex, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review