The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures: The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group *
Abstract
Preliminary reports have suggested that chronic, intermittent stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is an alternative treatment for patients with medically refractory seizures. We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive VNS in patients with poorly controlled partial seizures. An implanted, programmable pacemaker-like device was connected to two stimulating electrodes wrapped around the left vagus nerve. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 14 weeks of high-level stimulation (presumed therapeutic dose) or low-level stimulation (presumed subtherapeutic dose) using a blinded, parallel study design. Seizure frequency was compared with a 12-week baseline. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 24.5% for the "high" stimulation group versus 6.1% for the "low" stimulation group (p = 0.01). Thirty-one percent of patients receiving high stimulation had a seizure frequency reduction of > or = 50%, versus 13% of patients in the low group (p = 0.02). Treatment emergent side effects were largely limited to a transient hoarseness occurring during the stimulation train. One patient with no previous history of cardiac disease experienced a myocardial infarction during the third month of vagal stimulation. VNS may be an effective alternative treatment for patients who have failed antiepileptic drug therapy and are not optimal candidates for epilepsy surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rush, A. J., George, M. S., Sackeim, H. A., Marangell, L. B., Husain, M. M., Giller, C., Nahas, Z., Haines, S., Simpson, R. K., & Goodman, R. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00304-2 · Cited by 688
Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures
Bergey, G. K., Morrell, M. J., Mizrahi, E. M., Goldman, A., King-Stephens, D., Nair, D., Srinivasan, S., Jobst, B., Gross, R. E., Shields, D. C., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001280 · Cited by 634
Sackeim, H. (2001) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00271-8 · Cited by 568
Locus Coeruleus Lesions Suppress the Seizure‐Attenuating Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Krahl, S. E., Clark, K. B., Smith, D. C., & Browning, R. A. (1998) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01155.x · Cited by 555
Nemeroff, C. B., Mayberg, H. S., Krahl, S. E., McNamara, J., Frazer, A., Henry, T. R., George, M. S., Charney, D. S., & Brannan, S. K. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301082 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-230
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2442539006
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures: The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.45.2.224
- The paper
- A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures: The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group *. (1995). Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.45.2.224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.