The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amantadine treatment is an independent predictor of improved survival in Parkinson's disease
Abstract
Amantadine has been used for more than 20 years in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Several recent discoveries suggest that amantadine could also have a neuroprotective effect in PD. We studied survival in all parkinsonism (including PD and other parkinsonian syndromes) patients attending a single clinic, employing standard survival curves and a Cox regression model, to identify independent predictive variables for survival (while taking into account factors potentially associated with both outcome and treatment selection). Amantadine-treated patients (n = 250) were similar to the patients not treated with amantadine (n = 586) in terms of age, gender, type of parkinsonism, Hoehn and Yahr stage and dementia status at initial neurological visit. Amantadine use was an independent predictor of improved survival (p < 0.01). Improved survival was also associated with a higher 10-year expected survival (based on age, gender, and birth year), absence of dementia, type of parkinsonism = PD, and low Hoehn and Yahr stage (I or II) at initial neurologic visit (all p < 0.01); these additional factors occurred in statistically similar proportions in the groups that were and were not treated with amantadine. The association of improved survival with amantadine use may stem from symptomatic benefit or may reflect a "neuroprotective" effect, mediated through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism, dopamine uptake blockade activity, or other mechanisms. Our preliminary findings suggest that a prospective, controlled, randomized trial of amantadine's effects on PD progression is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Lipophilic Bullet Hits the Targets: Medicinal Chemistry of Adamantane Derivatives
Wanka, L., Iqbal, K., & Schreiner, P. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100264t · Cited by 696
Olivares, D., K. Deshpande, V., Shi, Y., K. Lahiri, D., H. Greig, N., T. Rogers, J., & Huang, X. (2012) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720512801322564 · Cited by 407
Limitations of current Parkinson's disease therapy
Rascol, O., Payoux, P., Ory, F., Ferreira, J. J., Brefel-Courbon, C., & Montastruc, J.-L. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10513 · Cited by 337
An inflammatory review of Parkinson's disease
Orr, C. F., Rowe, D. B., & Halliday, G. M. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00127-2 · Cited by 309
The Role of Iron in Neurodegeneration: Prospects for Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson??s Disease
Jellinger, K. A. (1999) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-199914020-00004 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Uitti, R. J., Rajput, A. H., Ahlskog, J. E., Offord, K. P., Schroeder, D. R., Ho, M. M., Prasad, M., Rajput, A., & Basran, P.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1551-1556
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2164162110
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amantadine treatment is an independent predictor of improved survival in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.46.6.1551
- The paper
- Uitti, R. J., Rajput, A. H., Ahlskog, J. E., Offord, K. P., Schroeder, D. R., Ho, M. M., Prasad, M., Rajput, A., & Basran, P. (1996). Amantadine treatment is an independent predictor of improved survival in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.46.6.1551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.