The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: A preliminary study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of language organization is crucial in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. In children, the current techniques, intra-carotid amobarbital test (IAT) for language dominance, and cortical electrostimulation mapping (ESM), are invasive and risky. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an alternative method for noninvasive functional mapping, through the detection of the hemodynamic changes associated with neuronal activation. We used fMRI, to assess language dominance in children with partial epilepsy. METHODS: Eleven right handed children and adolescents performed a word generation task during fMRI acquisition focused on the frontal lobes. Areas where the signal time course correlated with the test paradigm (r = 0.7) were considered activated. Extent and magnitude of signal changes were used to calculate asymmetry indices. Seven patients had IAT, ESM, or surgery outcome available for comparison. RESULTS: fMRI language dominance always agreed with IAT (6 cases) and ESM (1 case), showing left dominance in six and bilateral language in one. fMRI demonstrated left dominance in three additional children, and right dominance in one with early onset of left temporal epilepsy. Four children whose initial studies were equivocal due to noncompliance or motion artifacts were restudied successfully. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI can be used to assess language lateralization noninvasively in children. It has the potential to replace current functional mapping techniques in patients, and to provide important data on brain development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactive Specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development?
Johnson, M. H. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003 · Cited by 722
A shift from diffuse to focal cortical activity with development
Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Tottenham, N., Galvan, A., Spicer, J., Fossella, J. A., & Casey, B. J. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00454.x · Cited by 692
Functional anatomy of cognitive development: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults
Gaillard, W. D., Hertz–Pannier, L., Mott, S. H., Barnett, A. S., LeBihan, D., & Theodore, W. H. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.1.180 · Cited by 423
Self-citationFunctional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test
Lehéricy, S., Cohen, L., Bazin, B., Samson, S., Giacomini, E., Rougetet, R., Hertz-Pannier, L., Le Bihan, D., Marsault, C., & Baulac, M. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.8.1625 · Cited by 418
Self-citationPlasticity of Language-Related Brain Function During Recovery From Stroke
Thulborn, K. R., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.4.749 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Hertz-Pannier, L., Gaillard, W. D., Mott, S. H., Cuenod, C. A., Bookheimer, S. Y., Weinstein, S., Conry, J., Papero, P. H., Schiff, S. J., Bihan, D. L., & Theodore, W. H.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1003-1012
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2053278179
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: A preliminary study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.48.4.1003
- The paper
- Hertz-Pannier, L., Gaillard, W. D., Mott, S. H., Cuenod, C. A., Bookheimer, S. Y., Weinstein, S., Conry, J., Papero, P. H., Schiff, S. J., Bihan, D. L., & Theodore, W. H. (1997). Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: A preliminary study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.4.1003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.