The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine objectively the clinical effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in advanced PD. METHODS: Our initial seven consecutive patients with medication-refractory motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias undergoing chronic STN DBS underwent a standardized preoperative evaluation followed by a 2-day double-blind evaluation of efficacy 6 to 12 months after electrode implantation. Diaries documenting motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were also completed preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: In the medication-off state, turning the stimulators on resulted in improvement in mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score by 58% including the following improvements in composite scores: akinesia 57%, rigidity 52%, tremor 82%, and gait and postural stability 49%. Additionally, the medication-off state improved 17% without stimulation, possibly as a result of electrode insertion alone or carry-over of chronic stimulation. In the medication-on, stimulation-on state, all major features of parkinsonism improved and total UPDRS motor score improved 41% compared with before surgery. Activities of daily living were improved while off medication 30%, and levodopa-induced dyskinesias were reduced 83% while total drug dosage was decreased 40%. With chronic stimulation, patients reported that the percentage of time spent in the "on" state (without dyskinesias) increased from 26% to 52% and "off" time decreased from 30% to 6%. Operative complications including cognitive worsening were not uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: STN DBS is a promising new surgical option for the treatment of advanced PD. The marked clinical benefits obtained in these severely disabled patients outweighed the adverse effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease
Benabid, A. L., Chabardes, S., Mitrofanis, J., & Pollak, P. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70291-6 · Cited by 1,285
Perlmutter, J. S., & Mink, J. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112824 · Cited by 1,073
Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits underlying brain disease in animal models
Tye, K. M., & Deisseroth, K. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3171 · Cited by 745
Cerebral causes and consequences of parkinsonian resting tremor: a tale of two circuits?
Helmich, R. C., Hallett, M., Deuschl, G., Toni, I., & Bloem, B. R. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws023 · Cited by 581
History, Applications, and Mechanisms of Deep Brain Stimulation
Miocinovic, S., Somayajula, S., Chitnis, S., & Vitek, J. L. (2013) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.45 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, R., Lozano, A. M., Kim, Y. J., Hutchison, W. D., Sime, E., Halket, E., & Lang, A. E.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 850-855
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2061644128
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.51.3.850
- The paper
- Kumar, R., Lozano, A. M., Kim, Y. J., Hutchison, W. D., Sime, E., Halket, E., & Lang, A. E. (1998). Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.3.850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.