The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson's disease tremor
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with medically refractory essential tremor (ET) and the tremor associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: The tremor of ET and PD may produce functional disability despite optimal medical therapy. Several reports have demonstrated efficacy of thalamic DBS in this scenario. METHODS: Preoperative and 3-month postoperative tremor ratings were compared in 33 patients (14 ET and 19 PD) with severe tremor. Evaluations included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores for PD patients and a modified Unified Tremor Rating Scale in ET patients. Open-label and blinded data (unknown activation status) were obtained. RESULTS: ET patients demonstrated an 83% reduction (p < 0.0001) in observed contralateral arm tremor. All measures of tremor including writing samples, pouring tests, subjective functional surveys, and disability scores improved significantly. PD patients demonstrated an 82% reduction (p < 0.0001) in contralateral tremor and significant improvement in disability and global impressions. There was, however, no meaningful improvement in other motor aspects of the disease, and the total UPDRS part II (activities of daily living) score did not change. Adverse events, more common in ET patients, were generally mild and were usually eliminated by adjustment of the device parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Thalamic DBS is a safe and effective treatment of ET and the tremor of PD. In PD, its use should be limited to patients in whom high-amplitude tremor results directly in significant functional disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, D. H., Albert, P. S., Barkhof, F., Francis, G., Frank, J. A., Hodgkinson, S., Lublin, F. D., Paty, D. W., Reingold, S. C., & Simon, J. (1996) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410390104 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Yuk, H., Lu, B., & Zhao, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00595h · Cited by 2,108
Perlmutter, J. S., & Mink, J. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112824 · Cited by 1,073
A Comparison of Continuous Thalamic Stimulation and Thalamotomy for Suppression of Severe Tremor
Schuurman, P. R., Bosch, D. A., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bonsel, G. J., van Someren, E. J. W., de Bie, R. M. A., Merkus, M. P., & Speelman, J. D. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002173420703 · Cited by 1,044
The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)
Olanow, C. W., Stern, M. B., & Sethi, K. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a1d44c · Cited by 908
Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing
Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K., & Malliaras, G. G. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601649 · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Ondo, W., Jankovic, J., Schwartz, K., Almaguer, M., & Simpson, R. K.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1063-1069
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2012306356
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson's disease tremor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.51.4.1063
- The paper
- Ondo, W., Jankovic, J., Schwartz, K., Almaguer, M., & Simpson, R. K. (1998). Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson's disease tremor. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.4.1063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.