Cited by 6,969Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

McDonald, W. Ian, Compston, Alistair, Edan, Gilles, Goodkin, Donald, Hartung, Hans‐Peter, Lublin, Fred D., McFarland, Henry F., Paty, Donald W. +8 more·2001·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

The International Panel on MS Diagnosis presents revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The focus remains on the objective demonstration of dissemination of lesions in both time and space. Magnetic resonance imaging is integrated with dinical and other paraclinical diagnostic methods. The revised criteria facilitate the diagnosis of MS in patients with a variety of presentations, including "monosymptomatic" disease suggestive of MS, disease with a typical relapsing-remitting course, and disease with insidious progression, without clear attacks and remissions. Previously used terms such as "clinically definite" and "probable MS" are no longer recommended. The outcome of a diagnostic evaluation is either MS, "possible MS" (for those at risk for MS, but for whom diagnostic evaluation is equivocal), or "not MS."

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.1032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 2001 and 2005 McDonald Criteria required three or more periventricular lesions as one of the anatomic locations that could fulfill MRI criteria for DIS.

    “The 2001 and 2005 McDonald Criteria required three or more periventricular lesions as one of the anatomic locations that could fulfill MRI criteria for DIS. 3,4”
  • Subsequent criteria incorporated imaging and other paraclinical markers in response to technological advances and new data.

    “Subsequent criteria incorporated imaging and other paraclinical markers in response to technological advances and new data. 2-5”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, W. I., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H., Lublin, F. D., McFarland, H. F., Paty, D. W., Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Sandberg‐Wollheim, M., Sibley, W., Thompson, A., Van Den Noort, S., Weinshenker, B. Y., & Wolinsky, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Physicians (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • National Multiple Sclerosis Society (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06-26
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
121-127
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2105490558
Cited by
6,969
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 221 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 284 · 2016: 296 · 2015: 317 · 2014: 372 · 2013: 413 · 2012: 423
FWCI
107.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, diagnostic criteria, magnetic resonance imaging, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review