The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform an open-label, long-term efficacy and safety/tolerability study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) of 454 patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Subjects were enrolled from five clinical trials of VNS between 1988 and 1995 after undergoing an implantation of a pulse generator in the chest and a left cervical vagus nerve-stimulating lead coil. Patients were assessed at 6-month intervals until device approval. Seizure frequencies, medication treatment, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and entered into a database. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients were implanted, and 440 patients yielded assessable data. A > or =50% seizure reduction postimplantation occurred in 36.8% of patients at 1 year, in 43.2% at 2 years, and in 42.7% at 3 years. Median seizure reductions compared with baseline were 35% at 1 year, 44.3% at 2 years, and 44.1% at 3 years. Most common AEs postimplantation at 1 year were hoarseness (28%) and paraesthesias (12%), at 2 years were hoarseness (19.8%) and headache (4.5%), and at 3 years was shortness of breath (3.2%). Continuation rates were 96.7% at 1 year, 84.7% at 2 years, and 72.1% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term, open-label vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) provided seizure reduction similar to or greater than acute studies, for median reductions and for those reaching a > or =50% seizure reduction. VNS remained safe and well tolerated, with nearly three-quarters of the patients choosing to continue therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria–gut–brain signals
Sarkar, A., Lehto, S. M., Harty, S., Dinan, T. G., Cryan, J. F., & Burnet, P. W. J. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.002 · Cited by 1,068
Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures
Bergey, G. K., Morrell, M. J., Mizrahi, E. M., Goldman, A., King-Stephens, D., Nair, D., Srinivasan, S., Jobst, B., Gross, R. E., Shields, D. C., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001280 · Cited by 634
Bonaz, B., Sinniger, V., & Pellissier, S. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271539 · Cited by 561
Sackeim, H. (2001) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00271-8 · Cited by 568
Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy
Ben-Menachem, E. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00220-x · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, G. L., Mueller, W. M., & The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E–E
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1731-1731
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2096688703
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1731
- The paper
- Morris, G. L., Mueller, W. M., & The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E–E. (1999). Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.