Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS

Tortorella, C., Viti, B., Bozzali, M., Sormani, M.P., Rizzo, G., Gilardi, M.F., Comi, G., Filippi, M.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 1) the ability of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) histogram analysis to detect the extent of changes occurring outside MS lesions seen on conventional scans, 2) whether such changes vary in the different MS clinical phenotypes, 3) whether the changes are associated with the extent and severity of the macroscopic lesion load, and 4) the contribution to brain atrophy. METHODS: Dual-echo, T1-weighted, and MT scans of the brain were obtained from 77 patients with varying MS courses and 20 age- and sex-matched control subjects. To create MT histograms of the normal-appearing cerebral tissue, MS lesions were segmented from dual-echo scans, superimposed automatically, and nulled out from the coregistered and scalp-stripped MTR maps. Average MTR, peak height, and peak position were considered. T2 and T1 lesion loads, average lesion MTR, and brain volume were also measured. RESULTS: Average histogram MTR (p<0.0001) and peak position (p<0.0001) from patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RMMS) were lower than those from control subjects. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) had lower average histogram MTR (p = 0.002) and histogram peak height (p = 0.01) than control subjects. Patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) had a lower peak height (p = 0.05) than those with RRMS. Average lesion MTR (p<0.0001) correlated highly with the histogram MTR. Average histogram MTR (p<0.0001) and T2 lesion load (p = 0.001) correlated highly with brain volume. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of microscopic changes account for an important fraction of the lesion load in MS. They may contribute to the development of brain atrophy and tend to be more evident in patients with secondary progressive MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.54.1.186

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Tortorella, C., Viti, B., Bozzali, M., Sormani, M. P., Rizzo, G., Gilardi, M. F., Comi, G., & Filippi, M.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-01-11
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
186-186
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2012185320
Cited by
181
References
4
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.1.186
The paper
Tortorella, C., Viti, B., Bozzali, M., Sormani, M. P., Rizzo, G., Gilardi, M. F., Comi, G., & Filippi, M. (2000). A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.1.186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.