Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS: Part I: Trial design and clinical results

Noseworthy, J.H., Wolinsky, J.S., Lublin, F.D., Whitaker, J.N., Linde, A., Gjorstrup, P., Sullivan, H.C., the North American Linomide Investigators·2000·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether linomide (roquinimex) is better than placebo in slowing the time to confirmed clinical worsening in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) MS. METHODS: In this 27-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, phase III trial, 715 patients with active RRMS (n = 90) or SPMS (n = 625) were randomized to receive either linomide (1.0, 2.5, or 7.5 mg orally daily) or placebo. Patients were evaluated at 3-month intervals clinically and with MRI. The planned primary outcome was the time to the development of "confirmed" clinical worsening (increase of >/= 1.0 Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score for an enrollment EDSS score </= 5.0, or >/= 0.5 point for an enrollment EDSS score of >/= 5.5) not associated with an acute relapse. RESULTS: The trial was terminated 1 month after it became fully enrolled due to unanticipated serious cardiopulmonary toxicities (pericarditis, pleural effusion, myocardial infarction, and possible pulmonary embolism), pancreatitis, and death. Notable arthralgia, myalgia, bursitis, and facial and peripheral edema were common adverse events. The high dose of linomide (7.5 mg) was not well tolerated. The trial was too brief to determine unequivocal clinical benefits. Trends suggested an unconfirmed early effect on change in EDSS score at 6 months for the medium dose (2.5 mg daily). CONCLUSION: MS patients may be more prone to develop important linomide treatment-related adverse events than other previously studied patients. However, linomide may be a potentially more toxic drug than was suspected from observations made in smaller studies for other indications. Phase III trials may identify infrequent and important toxicities that may not be anticipated by phase I and II trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1726

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Noseworthy, J. H., Wolinsky, J. S., Lublin, F. D., Whitaker, J. N., Linde, A., Gjorstrup, P., Sullivan, H. C., & the North American Linomide Investigators
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-05-09
Volume
54
Issue
9
Pages
1726-1733
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2080849584
Cited by
174
References
2
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS: Part I: Trial design and clinical results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.9.1726
The paper
Noseworthy, J. H., Wolinsky, J. S., Lublin, F. D., Whitaker, J. N., Linde, A., Gjorstrup, P., Sullivan, H. C., & the North American Linomide Investigators. (2000). Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS: Part I: Trial design and clinical results. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.9.1726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.