Cited by 309Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Warfarin-associated hemorrhage and cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Rosand, Jonathan, Hylek, Elaine M., O’Donnell, Heather C., Greenberg, Steven M.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared complication of warfarin therapy. The pathogenesis of this often-fatal complication remains obscure. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a major cause of spontaneous lobar hemorrhage in the elderly and is associated with specific alleles of the APOE gene. OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of CAA in warfarin-associated ICH. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and APOE genotype were compared between 41 patients with warfarin-related ICH (from a cohort of 59 consecutive patients aged > or = 65 years with supratentorial ICH on warfarin) and 66 randomly selected individuals aged > or = 65 years without ICH taking warfarin. In addition, all neuropathologic specimens from ICH patients were reviewed for the presence and severity of CAA. RESULTS: Hemorrhages tended to be in the lobar regions of the brain, and most (76%) occurred with an international normalized ratio of < or = 3.0. The APOE epsilon2 allele was overrepresented among patients with warfarin-associated lobar hemorrhage (allele frequency 0.13 versus 0.04 in control subjects; p = 0.031). After controlling for other variables associated with ICH, carriers of the epsilon2 allele had an OR of 3.8 (95% CI, 1.0 to 14.6) for lobar ICH. CAA was pathologically diagnosed as the cause of lobar hemorrhage in 7 of 11 patients with available tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: CAA is an important cause of warfarin-associated lobar ICH in the elderly. Although diagnosis of CAA before hemorrhage is not yet possible, these data offer hope that future patients at high risk for hemorrhage may be identified before initiation of warfarin therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.55.7.947

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet . 1994; 343: 687–691.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosand, J., Hylek, E. M., O’Donnell, H. C., & Greenberg, S. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-10-10
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
947-951
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2068808615
Cited by
309
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00725)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Keywords
warfarin, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, APOE ε2 allele, lobar hemorrhage, elderly patients, international normalized ratio, hemorrhagic stroke risk, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Warfarin, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review