The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disruption of cortical function can improve behavior. Motor cortex (M1) transcallosal interactions are mainly inhibitory; after unilateral damage to M1, there is increased excitability of the unaffected M1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 produces a temporary reduction in cortical excitability in the same M1 that outlasts the duration of the rTMS train. The authors hypothesize that reducing cortical excitability of M1 by rTMS may improve motor performance in the ipsilateral hand by releasing the contralateral M1 from transcallosal inhibition. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Using a sequential key-pressing task with the index finger, motor performance was monitored before and after rTMS (1 Hz for 10 minutes with the intensity below motor threshold) applied to the ipsilateral M1, contralateral M1, ipsilateral premotor area, or vertex (Cz). RESULTS: rTMS of M1 shortened execution time of the motor task with the ipsilateral hand without affecting performance with the contralateral hand. This effect outlasted rTMS by at least 10 minutes, was specific for M1 stimulation, and was associated with increased intracortical excitability in the unstimulated M1. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results support the concept of an interhemispheric "rivalry." They demonstrate the utility of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to explore the functional facilitation of the unstimulated counterpart motor cortex, presumably via suppression of activity in the stimulated motor cortex and transcallosal inhibition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 · Cited by 2,128
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Information capacity of discrete motor responses.
Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045689 · Cited by 1,534
Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex
Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Wissel, J., Dang, N., Kofler, M., Facchini, S., Boroojerdi, B., Poewe, W., & Hallett, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature712 · Cited by 803
Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implications for learning, memory and mental illness
(1994) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60543-9 · Cited by 565
Cited by
The plastic human brain cortex
Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216 · Cited by 1,929
Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients
Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Mansur, C. G., Wagner, T., Ferreira, M. J. L., Lima, M. C., Rigonatti, S. P., Marcolin, M. A., Freedman, S. D., Nitsche, M. A., et al. (2005) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e · Cited by 600
Self-citationEnhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Luber, B., & Lisanby, S. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.007 · Cited by 508
The Cellular Basis of GABA B -Mediated Interhemispheric Inhibition
Palmer, L. M., Schulz, J. M., Murphy, S. C., Ledergerber, D., Murayama, M., & Larkum, M. E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217276 · Cited by 284
Nettekoven, C., Volz, L. J., Kutscha, M., Pool, E.-M., Rehme, A. K., Eickhoff, S. B., Fink, G. R., & Grefkes, C. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4993-13.2014 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., & Pascual-Leone, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2004-01-13
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2049524944
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.62.1.91
- The paper
- Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.1.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.