Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements

Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., Pascual-Leone, A.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disruption of cortical function can improve behavior. Motor cortex (M1) transcallosal interactions are mainly inhibitory; after unilateral damage to M1, there is increased excitability of the unaffected M1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 produces a temporary reduction in cortical excitability in the same M1 that outlasts the duration of the rTMS train. The authors hypothesize that reducing cortical excitability of M1 by rTMS may improve motor performance in the ipsilateral hand by releasing the contralateral M1 from transcallosal inhibition. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Using a sequential key-pressing task with the index finger, motor performance was monitored before and after rTMS (1 Hz for 10 minutes with the intensity below motor threshold) applied to the ipsilateral M1, contralateral M1, ipsilateral premotor area, or vertex (Cz). RESULTS: rTMS of M1 shortened execution time of the motor task with the ipsilateral hand without affecting performance with the contralateral hand. This effect outlasted rTMS by at least 10 minutes, was specific for M1 stimulation, and was associated with increased intracortical excitability in the unstimulated M1. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results support the concept of an interhemispheric "rivalry." They demonstrate the utility of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to explore the functional facilitation of the unstimulated counterpart motor cortex, presumably via suppression of activity in the stimulated motor cortex and transcallosal inhibition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.62.1.91

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-01-13
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
91-98
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2049524944
Cited by
266
References
6
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.62.1.91
The paper
Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.1.91

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.