Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: [RETIRED]: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology*

Open access
Sloan, M. A., Alexandrov, A. V., Tegeler, C. H., Spencer, M. P., Caplan, L. R., Feldmann, E., Wechsler, L. R., Newell, D. W., Gomez, C. R., Babikian, V. L., Lefkowitz, D., Goldman, R. S., Armon, C., Hsu, C. Y., Goodin, D. S.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) and transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) for diagnosis. METHODS: The authors searched the literature for evidence of 1) if TCD provides useful information in specific clinical settings; 2) if using this information improves clinical decision making, as reflected by improved patient outcomes; and 3) if TCD is preferable to other diagnostic tests in these clinical situations. RESULTS: TCD is of established value in the screening of children aged 2 to 16 years with sickle cell disease for stroke risk (Type A, Class I) and the detection and monitoring of angiographic vasospasm after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (Type A, Class I to II). TCD and TCCS provide important information and may have value for detection of intracranial steno-occlusive disease (Type B, Class II to III), vasomotor reactivity testing (Type B, Class II to III), detection of cerebral circulatory arrest/brain death (Type A, Class II), monitoring carotid endarterectomy (Type B, Class II to III), monitoring cerebral thrombolysis (Type B, Class II to III), and monitoring coronary artery bypass graft operations (Type B to C, Class II to III). Contrast-enhanced TCD/TCCS can also provide useful information in right-to-left cardiac/extracardiac shunts (Type A, Class II), intracranial occlusive disease (Type B, Class II to IV), and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease (Type B, Class II to IV), although other techniques may be preferable in these settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.62.9.1468

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Sloan, M. A., Alexandrov, A. V., Tegeler, C. H., Spencer, M. P., Caplan, L. R., Feldmann, E., Wechsler, L. R., Newell, D. W., Gomez, C. R., Babikian, V. L., Lefkowitz, D., Goldman, R. S., Armon, C., Hsu, C. Y., & Goodin, D. S.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-05-11
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
1468-1481
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W4297040316
Cited by
517
References
50
FWCI
20.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: [RETIRED]: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.62.9.1468
The paper
Sloan, M. A., Alexandrov, A. V., Tegeler, C. H., Spencer, M. P., Caplan, L. R., Feldmann, E., Wechsler, L. R., Newell, D. W., Gomez, C. R., Babikian, V. L., Lefkowitz, D., Goldman, R. S., Armon, C., Hsu, C. Y., & Goodin, D. S. (2004). Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: [RETIRED]: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology*. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.9.1468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.