The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of the Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Arterial Oxygenation During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
Abstract
Abnormalities in gas exchange that occur during anesthesia are mostly caused by atelectasis, and these alterations are more pronounced in morbidly obese than in normal weight subjects. Sustained lung insufflation is capable of recruiting the collapsed areas and improving oxygenation in healthy patients of normal weight. We tested the effect of this ventilatory strategy on arterial oxygenation (Pao2) in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. After pneumoperitoneum was accomplished, the recruitment group received up to 4 sustained lung inflations with peak inspiratory pressures up to 50 cm H2O, which was followed by ventilation with 12 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The patient's lungs in the control group were ventilated in a standard fashion with PEEP of 4 cm H2O. Variables related to gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics were compared between recruitment and control groups. We found that alveolar recruitment effectively increased intraoperative Pao2 and temporarily increased respiratory system dynamic compliance (both P < 0.01). The effects of alveolar recruitment on oxygenation lasted as long as the trachea was intubated, and lungs were ventilated with high PEEP, but soon after tracheal extubation, all the beneficial effects on oxygenation disappeared. The mean number of vasopressor treatments given during surgery was larger in the recruitment group compared with the control group (3.0 versus 0.8; P = 0.04). In conclusion, our data suggest that the use of alveolar recruitment may be an effective mode of improving intraoperative oxygenation in morbidly obese patients. Our results showed the effect to be short lived and associated with more frequent intraoperative use of vasopressors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pelosi, P., Croci, M., Ravagnan, I., Tredici, S., Pedoto, A., Lissoni, A., & Gattinoni, L. (1998) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-199809000-00031 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Young, C. C., Harris, E. M., Vacchiano, C., Bodnar, S., Bukowy, B., Elliott, R. R. D., Migliarese, J., Ragains, C., Trethewey, B., Woodward, A., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017 · Cited by 435
Self-citationPoirier, P., Alpert, M. A., Fleisher, L. A., Thompson, P. D., Sugerman, H. J., Burke, L. E., Marceau, P., & Franklin, B. A. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192575 · Cited by 294
Guo, C., Weber, R. J. M., Buckley, A., Mazzolini, J., Robertson, S., Delgado-Saborit, J. M., Rappoport, J. Z., Warren, J., Hodgson, A., Sanderson, P., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020556 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Whalen, F. X., Gajic, O., Thompson, G. B., Kendrick, M. L., Que, F. L., Williams, B. A., Joyner, M. J., Hubmayr, R. D., Warner, D. O., & Sprung, J.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 298-305
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981731833
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of the Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Arterial Oxygenation During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a
- The paper
- Whalen, F. X., Gajic, O., Thompson, G. B., Kendrick, M. L., Que, F. L., Williams, B. A., Joyner, M. J., Hubmayr, R. D., Warner, D. O., & Sprung, J. (2006). The Effects of the Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Arterial Oxygenation During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.