The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Nutrition Screening and Therapy Within a Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathway
Open accessAbstract
Perioperative malnutrition has proven to be challenging to define, diagnose, and treat. Despite these challenges, it is well known that suboptimal nutritional status is a strong independent predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. Although perioperative caregivers consistently express recognition of the importance of nutrition screening and optimization in the perioperative period, implementation of evidence-based perioperative nutrition guidelines and pathways in the United States has been quite limited and needs to be addressed in surgery-focused recommendations. The second Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together a group of international experts with the objective of providing consensus recommendations on this important topic with the goal of (1) developing guidelines for screening of nutritional status to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes due to malnutrition; (2) address optimal methods of providing nutritional support and optimizing nutrition status preoperatively; and (3) identifying when and how to optimize nutrition delivery in the postoperative period. Discussion led to strong recommendations for implementation of routine preoperative nutrition screening to identify patients in need of preoperative nutrition optimization. Postoperatively, nutrition delivery should be restarted immediately after surgery. The key role of oral nutrition supplements, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition (implemented in that order) in most perioperative patients was advocated for with protein delivery being more important than total calorie delivery. Finally, the role of often-inadequate nutrition intake in the posthospital setting was discussed, and the role of postdischarge oral nutrition supplements was emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McClave, S. A., Taylor, B. E., Martindale, R. G., Warren, M. M., Johnson, D. R., Braunschweig, C., McCarthy, M. S., Davanos, E., Rice, T. W., Cresci, G. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607115621863 · Cited by 3,982
Nutritional Assessment: A Comparison of Clinical Judgment and Objective Measurements
Baker, J. P., Detsky, A. S., Wesson, D. E., Wolman, S. L., Stewart, S., Whitewell, J., Langer, B., & Jeejeebhoy, K. N. (1982) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198204223061606 · Cited by 1,019
Lewis, S. J., Egger, M., Sylvester, P. A., & Thomas, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773 · Cited by 858
Heidegger, C. P., Berger, M. M., Graf, S., Zingg, W., Darmon, P., Costanza, M. C., Thibault, R., & Pichard, C. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61351-8 · Cited by 776
Deutz, N. E., Matheson, E. M., Matarese, L. E., Luo, M., Baggs, G. E., Nelson, J. L., Hegazi, R. A., Tappenden, K. A., & Ziegler, T. R. (2016) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.010 · Cited by 472
Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care
Gillis, C., & Carli, F. (2015) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000795 · Cited by 350
Self-citationProtein Intake and Incident Frailty in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study
Beasley, J. M., LaCroix, A. Z., Neuhouser, M. L., Huang, Y., Tinker, L., Woods, N., Michael, Y., Curb, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02866.x · Cited by 337
Ferrando, A. A., Paddon-Jones, D., Hays, N. P., Kortebein, P., Ronsen, O., Williams, R. H., McComb, A., Symons, T. B., Wolfe, R. R., & Evans, W. (2010) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.03.009 · Cited by 237
Stratton, R. J., Hébuterne, X., & Elia, M. (2013) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2013.07.002 · Cited by 183
Pradelli, L., Mayer, K., Muscaritoli, M., & Heller, A. R. (2012) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11668 · Cited by 172
Cited by
The use of visceral proteins as nutrition markers: an ASPEN position paper
Evans, D. C., Corkins, M. R., Malone, A., Miller, S., Mogensen, K. M., Guenter, P., Jensen, G. L., & the ASPEN Malnutrition Committee (2021) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1002/ncp.10588 · Cited by 589
Self-citationMolenaar, C. J. L., Minnella, E. M., Coca-Martinez, M., ten Cate, D. W. G., Regis, M., Awasthi, R., Martínez-Palli, G., López-Baamonde, M., Sebio-Garcia, R., Feo, C. V., et al. (2023) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0198 · Cited by 539
Self-citationNutrition Care Process Model Approach to Surgical Prehabilitation in Oncology
Gillis, C., Hasil, L., Kasvis, P., Bibby, N., Davies, S. J., Prado, C. M., West, M. A., & Shaw, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.644706 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Wischmeyer, P. E., Carli, F., Evans, D. C., Guilbert, S., Kozar, R., Pryor, A., Thiele, R. H., Everett, S., Grocott, M., Gan, T. J., Shaw, A. D., Thacker, J. K. M., & Miller, T. E.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1883-1895
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787450491
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 38.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
