Cited by 89Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Risk Factors, Etiologies, and Screening Tools for Sepsis in Pregnant Women: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

Open access
Bauer, Melissa E., Housey, Michelle, Bauer, Samuel T., Behrmann, Sydney, Chau, Anthony, Clancy, Caitlin, Clark, Erin A. S., Einav, Sharon +13 more·2019·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the significant morbidity and mortality of maternal sepsis, early identification is key to improve outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the performance characteristics of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and maternal early warning (MEW) criteria for identifying cases of impending sepsis in parturients. The secondary objective of this study is to identify etiologies and risk factors for maternal sepsis and to assess timing of antibiotics in patients diagnosed with sepsis. METHODS: Validated maternal sepsis cases during the delivery hospitalization from 1995 to 2012 were retrospectively identified at 7 academic medical centers in the United States and Israel. Control patients were matched by date of delivery in a 1:4 ratio. The sensitivity and specificity of SIRS, qSOFA, and MEW criteria for identifying sepsis were calculated. Data including potential risk factors, vital signs, laboratory values, and clinical management were collected for cases and controls. RESULTS: Eighty-two sepsis cases during the delivery hospitalization were identified and matched to 328 controls. The most common causes of sepsis were the following: chorioamnionitis 20 (24.4%), endometritis 19 (23.2%), and pneumonia 9 (11.0%). Escherichia coli 12 (14.6%), other Gram-negative rods 8 (9.8%), and group A Streptococcus 6 (7.3%) were the most commonly found pathogens. The sensitivities and specificities for meeting criteria for screening tools were as follows: (1) SIRS (0.93, 0.63); (2) qSOFA (0.50, 0.95); and (3) MEW criteria for identifying sepsis (0.82, 0.87). Of 82 women with sepsis, 10 (12.2%) died. The mortality rate for those who received antibiotics within 1 hour of diagnosis was 8.3%. The mortality rate was 20% for the patients who received antibiotics after >1 hour. CONCLUSIONS: Chorioamnionitis and endometritis were the most common causes of sepsis, together accounting for about half of cases. Notable differences were observed in the sensitivity and specificity of sepsis screening tools with the highest to lowest sensitivity being SIRS, MEW, and qSOFA criteria, and the highest to lowest specificity being qSOFA, MEW, and SIRS. Mortality was doubled in the cohort of patients who received antibiotics after >1 hour. Clinicians need to be vigilant to identify cases of peripartum sepsis early in its course and prioritize timely antibiotic therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0000000000003709

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common sites of infection in pregnant and postpartum women are the urinary system (5.2%), reproductive system (such as chorioamnionitis, 27.6%) and respiratory system (13.8%). Other common infections include surgical incision infections and skin and soft tissue infections (3.5%).

    “The most common sites of infection in pregnant and postpartum women are the urinary system (accounting for 5.2%), reproductive system (such as chorioamnionitis, accounting for 27.6%) and respiratory system (accounting for 13.8%).35,36 Other common infections include surgical incision infections and skin and soft tissue infections (accounting for 3.5%).37,38”

    From Clinical and Pathogenic Characteristics of 45 Cases of Bloodstream Infection in Obstetrics: A Clinical Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Knight M, Nair M, Tuffnell D, Shakespeare J, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2017.
  2. [8]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 801– 810. 26903338 PMC4968574
  3. [17]Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons Learned to Inform Future Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–2012.: Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, M. E., Housey, M., Bauer, S. T., Behrmann, S., Chau, A., Clancy, C., Clark, E. A. S., Einav, S., Langen, E., Leffert, L., Lin, S., Madapu, M., Maile, M. D., McQuaid-Hanson, E., Priessnitz, K., Sela, H. Y., Shah, A., Sobolewski, P., Toledo, P., Tsen, L. C., & Bateman, B. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Beaumont Health (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bauer, Melissa E.
  • Housey, Michelle
  • Behrmann, Sydney
  • Maile, Michael D.
  • Priessnitz, Kristina
  • Sela, Hen Y.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2019-12
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
1613-1620
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922814492
Cited by
89
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002241, UL1TR000433)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K08HD075831)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
maternal sepsis, pregnancy, sepsis screening, qSOFA, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, sepsis etiology, risk factors, timing of antibiotic administration, sepsis mortality, parturients, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pyogenes, Gram-negative bacteria, pneumonia in pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Chorioamnionitis, Endometritis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Sepsis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review