Epidural Analgesia During Childbirth and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe pain has been linked to depression, which raises the question of whether epidural analgesia (EDA) during childbirth is associated with a reduced risk of postpartum depression (PPD). This association has been explored previously, but the studies were restricted by small sample sizes and the inability to control for relevant confounders. This study aimed to investigate the association between the administration of EDA and the development of PPD after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Biology, Affect, Stress, Imaging and Cognition (BASIC) project (2009–2017), a population-based longitudinal cohort study of pregnant women conducted at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden. The outcome was PPD at 6 weeks postpartum, defined as a score of ≥12 points on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Information was collected through medical records and self-reported web-based questionnaires during pregnancy and 6 weeks after childbirth. Only primiparous women with spontaneous start of childbirth were included (n = 1503). The association between EDA and PPD was examined in multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 1503 women included in the analysis, 800 (53%) reported use of EDA during childbirth. PPD at 6 weeks postpartum was present in 193 (13%) women. EDA was not associated with higher odds of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum after adjusting for suspected confounders (age, fear of childbirth, antenatal depressive symptoms; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.87–1.72). CONCLUSIONS: EDA was not associated with the risk of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables. However, these findings do not preclude a potential association between PPD and childbirth pain or other aspects of EDA that were not assessed in this study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across observational studies, cohort analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, neuraxial anesthesia does not appear to increase the risk of postpartum depression at the population level.
“Across observational studies, cohort analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, neuraxial anesthesia does not appear to increase the risk of PPD at the population level.”
Across delivery modes, the relationship between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression is best characterized as neutral at the population level, with potential protective effects in select clinical contexts.
“Across delivery modes, the relationship between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression (PPD) appears complex but is best characterized as neutral at the population level, with potential protective effects in select clinical contexts has been described as either protective or neutral at various amounts of time postpartum across many studies.37–51”
Many studies demonstrate a neutral association between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression.
“Many studies demonstrate a neutral association”
Neuraxial anesthesia is not associated with increased risk of postpartum depression and may have neutral or protective effects, particularly compared with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
“Collectively, available evidence indicates that neuraxial anesthesia likely does not increase the risk of postpartum depression and may exhibit either neutral or modest protective effects in labor.37–51”
Several recent studies demonstrate no independent association between epidural use and postpartum depression after adjustment for psychosocial confounding variables.
“However, several recent studies demonstrate no independent association between epidural use and PPD after adjustment for psychosocial confounding variables.45–51”
Cites
Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’
Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M. S., Liśkiewicz, M., & Ellison, G. T. H. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw341 · Cited by 2,295 · see citing works
Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review
Hodnett, E. D. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70189-0 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
The Swedish validation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during pregnancy
Rubertsson, C., Börjesson, K., Berglund, A., Josefsson, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2011) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/08039488.2011.590606 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Sword, W., Kurtz Landy, C., Thabane, L., Watt, S., Krueger, P., Farine, D., & Foster, G. (2011) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02950.x · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Räisänen, S., Lehto, S. M., Nielsen, H. S., Gissler, M., Kramer, M. R., & Heinonen, S. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004047 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: When and how?
Moraes, G. P. D. A., Lorenzo, L., Pontes, G. A. R., Montenegro, M. C., & Cantilino, A. (2017) · Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy · doi:10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0034 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Women׳s experiences of coping with pain during childbirth: A critical review of qualitative research
Van der Gucht, N., & Lewis, K. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.005 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fagan, J., Dufour, S., Duet, S., Downs, E., Siddaiah, H., Viswanath, O., Shekoohi, S., & Kaye, A. (2026) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s579920
- Authors
- Eckerdal, P., Kollia, N., Karlsson, L., Skoog-Svanberg, A., Wikström, A.-K., Högberg, U., & Skalkidou, A.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
- Department of Child Psychiatry, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
- Corresponding author
- Eckerdal, Patricia
- Skoog-Svanberg, Agneta
- Wikström, Anna-Karin
- Högberg, Ulf
- Skalkidou, Alkistis
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 615-624
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2961162774
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- epidural analgesia, childbirth, postpartum depression, labor pain, primiparous women, antenatal depressive symptoms, fear of childbirth, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Fear, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Analgesia, Epidural, Treatment Outcome, Depression, Postpartum, Parturition, Labor Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review