The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory
Open accessAbstract
Coefficient estimation and variable selection in multiple linear regression is routinely done in the (penalized) least squares (LS) framework. The concept of model selection oracle introduced by Fan and Li [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96 (2001) 1348–1360] characterizes the optimal behavior of a model selection procedure. However, the least-squares oracle theory breaks down if the error variance is infinite. In the current paper we propose a new regression method called composite quantile regression (CQR). We show that the oracle model selection theory using the CQR oracle works beautifully even when the error variance is infinite. We develop a new oracular procedure to achieve the optimal properties of the CQR oracle. When the error variance is finite, CQR still enjoys great advantages in terms of estimation efficiency. We show that the relative efficiency of CQR compared to the least squares is greater than 70% regardless the error distribution. Moreover, CQR could be much more efficient and sometimes arbitrarily more efficient than the least squares. The same conclusions hold when comparing a CQR-oracular estimator with a LS-oracular estimator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,269
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Self-citationKoenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143 · Cited by 4,413
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications
Feller, W., & Morse, P. M. (1958) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3062516 · Cited by 2,040
Better Subset Regression Using the Nonnegative Garrote
Breiman, L. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484371 · Cited by 1,043
Statistical challenges with high dimensionality: feature selection in knowledge discovery
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians Madrid, August 22–30, 2006 · doi:10.4171/022-3/31 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x · Cited by 2,711
Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension
Wang, L., Wu, Y., & Li, R. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.656014 · Cited by 323
Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation
Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1198 · Cited by 313
Self-citationKai, B., Li, R., & Zou, H. (2011) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos842 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, H., & Yuan, M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1108-1126
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996742192
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/07-aos507
- The paper
- Zou, H., & Yuan, M. (2008). Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aos507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.