The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random survival forests
Open accessAbstract
We introduce random survival forests, a random forests method for the analysis of right-censored survival data. New survival splitting rules for growing survival trees are introduced, as is a new missing data algorithm for imputing missing data. A conservation-of-events principle for survival forests is introduced and used to define ensemble mortality, a simple interpretable measure of mortality that can be used as a predicted outcome. Several illustrative examples are given, including a case study of the prognostic implications of body mass for individuals with coronary artery disease. Computations for all examples were implemented using the freely available R-software package, randomSurvivalForest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Random forests have been extended to the survival context by Ishwaran et al. (2008), who prove consistency of Random Survival Forests (RSF) algorithm assuming that all variables are categorical.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Ishwaran et al. (2008)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Dietz, W. H., Vinicor, F., Bales, V. S., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.76 · Cited by 5,866
Excess Deaths Associated With Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity
Flegal, K. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.15.1861 · Cited by 2,811
A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century
Olshansky, S. J., Passaro, D. J., Hershow, R. C., Layden, J., Carnes, B. A., Brody, J., Hayflick, L., Butler, R. N., Allison, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr043743 · Cited by 2,612
Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods
Bartlett, P. L., Freund, Y., Lee, W. S., & Schapire, R. E. (1998) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1024691352 · Cited by 2,574
Years of Life Lost Due to Obesity
Fontaine, K. R., Redden, D. T., Wang, C., Westfall, A. O., & Allison, D. B. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.2.187 · Cited by 2,551
Overweight, Obesity, and Mortality in a Large Prospective Cohort of Persons 50 to 71 Years Old
Adams, K. F., Schatzkin, A. G., Harris, T. B., Kipnis, V., Mouw, T., Ballard-Barbash, R. R., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Leitzmann, M. F. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055643 · Cited by 2,147
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fleming, T. and Harrington, D. (1991). Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. Wiley, New York.
- Kalbfleisch, J. and Prentice, R. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York.
- Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A. and Lenihan, K. J. (1980). Money, Work and Crime: Some Experimental Results. Academic Press, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Multi-cohort machine learning identifies predictors of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease
Loo, R. T. J., Pavelka, L., Mangone, G., Khoury, F., Vidailhet, M., Corvol, J.-C., Glaab, E., On behalf of the NCER-PD Consortium, Acharya, G., Aguayo, G., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01862-1 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Blackstone, E. H., & Lauer, M. S.
- ORCID
- Lauer, Michael S.
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 841-860
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2052825782
- Cited by
- 2,714
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 357 · 2025: 341 · 2024: 354 · 2023: 324 · 2022: 296 · 2021: 278 · 2020: 183 · 2019: 148 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- random survival forest, right-censored survival data, survival trees, missing data imputation, prognostic model, body mass, coronary artery disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
