Cited by 2,714Statistical Methods and InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Random survival forests

Open access

Ishwaran, Hemant, Kogalur, Udaya B., Blackstone, Eugene H., Lauer, Michael S.·2008·The Annals of Applied Statistics

DOI 10.1214/08-aoas169

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

We introduce random survival forests, a random forests method for the analysis of right-censored survival data. New survival splitting rules for growing survival trees are introduced, as is a new missing data algorithm for imputing missing data. A conservation-of-events principle for survival forests is introduced and used to define ensemble mortality, a simple interpretable measure of mortality that can be used as a predicted outcome. Several illustrative examples are given, including a case study of the prognostic implications of body mass for individuals with coronary artery disease. Computations for all examples were implemented using the freely available R-software package, randomSurvivalForest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/08-aoas169

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Random Forests
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Support-vector networks
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Bagging predictors
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Dietz, W. H., Vinicor, F., Bales, V. S., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.76 · Cited by 5,866
Excess Deaths Associated With Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity
Flegal, K. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.15.1861 · Cited by 2,811
A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century
Olshansky, S. J., Passaro, D. J., Hershow, R. C., Layden, J., Carnes, B. A., Brody, J., Hayflick, L., Butler, R. N., Allison, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr043743 · Cited by 2,612
Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods
Bartlett, P. L., Freund, Y., Lee, W. S., & Schapire, R. E. (1998) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1024691352 · Cited by 2,574
Years of Life Lost Due to Obesity
Fontaine, K. R., Redden, D. T., Wang, C., Westfall, A. O., & Allison, D. B. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.2.187 · Cited by 2,551
Overweight, Obesity, and Mortality in a Large Prospective Cohort of Persons 50 to 71 Years Old
Adams, K. F., Schatzkin, A. G., Harris, T. B., Kipnis, V., Mouw, T., Ballard-Barbash, R. R., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Leitzmann, M. F. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055643 · Cited by 2,147

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

Fleming, T. and Harrington, D. (1991). Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Kalbfleisch, J. and Prentice, R. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York.
Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A. and Lenihan, K. J. (1980). Money, Work and Crime: Some Experimental Results. Academic Press, New York.

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,001

Evaluating generalizability of oncology trial results to real-world patients using machine learning-based trial emulations
Orcutt, X., Chen, K., Mamtani, R., Long, Q., & Parikh, R. B. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03352-5 · Cited by 58
Predicting general criminal recidivism in mentally disordered offenders using a random forest approach
Pflueger, M. O., Franke, I., Graf, M., & Hachtel, H. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0447-4 · Cited by 56
Interrogating differences in expression of targeted gene sets to predict breast cancer outcome
Andres, S. A., Brock, G. N., & Wittliff, J. L. (2013) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-326 · Cited by 56
Censoring Unbiased Regression Trees and Ensembles
Steingrimsson, J., Diao, L., & Strawderman, R. (2018) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1407775 · Cited by 54
Identification of a Sixteen-gene Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Adenocarcinoma Using a Machine Learning Method
Ma, B., Geng, Y., Meng, F., Ge, Y., & Song, F. (2019) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.34585 · Cited by 54
High-Dimensional Survival Analysis: Methods and Applications
Salerno, S. M., & Li, Y. (2022) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-032921-022127 · Cited by 66
Adoption of Machine Learning in Pharmacometrics: An Overview of Recent Implementations and Their Considerations
Janßen, A., Bennis, F. C., & Mathôt, R. A. A. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14091814 · Cited by 57
Development and validation of DNA methylation scores in two European cohorts augment 10-year risk prediction of type 2 diabetes
Cheng, Y., Gadd, D. A., Gieger, C., Monterrubio‐Gómez, K., Zhang, Y., Berta, I., Stam, M. J., Szlachetka, N., Lobzaev, E., Wrobel, N., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00391-4 · Cited by 57
Personalized Risk Prediction in Clinical Oncology Research: Applications and Practical Issues Using Survival Trees and Random Forests
Hu, C., & Steingrimsson, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2017.1377730 · Cited by 55
Probabilistic Machine Learning for Healthcare
Chen, I. Y., Joshi, S. D., Ghassemi, M., & Ranganath, R. (2021) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-033938 · Cited by 68
Improvements to the Australian national soil thickness map using an integrated data mining approach
Malone, B., & Searle, R. D. (2020) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114579 · Cited by 54
Survival prediction and treatment optimization of multiple myeloma patients using machine-learning models based on clinical and gene expression data
Orgueira, A. M., González, M. S., Arias, J. Á. D., Rodríguez, B. A., Vence, N. A., López, Á. B., Blanco, A. A., Pérez, L. B., Raíndo, A. P., López, M. C., et al. (2021) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-021-01286-2 · Cited by 57
Associations between nutritional frailty and 8‐year all‐cause mortality in older adults: The Salus in Apulia Study
Zupo, R., Castellana, F., Guerra, V., Donghia, R., Bortone, I., Griseta, C., Lampignano, L., Dibello, V., Lozupone, M., Coelho‐Júnior, H. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13384 · Cited by 54
AI-driven predictive biomarker discovery with contrastive learning to improve clinical trial outcomes
Arango-Argoty, G., Bikiel, D. E., Sun, G. J., Kipkogei, E., Smith, K. M., Pro, S. C., Choe, E. Y., & Jacob, E. (2025) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.03.029 · Cited by 61
The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Comorbidity Index (CLL-CI): A Three-Factor Comorbidity Model
Gordon, M. J., Kaempf, A. J., Sitlinger, A. P., Shouse, G., Mei, M. G., Brander, D. M., Salous, T., Hill, B. T., Alqahtani, H., Choi, M. Y., et al. (2021) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3993 · Cited by 53
Multimodal survival prediction in advanced pancreatic cancer using machine learning
Keyl, J., Kasper, S., Wiesweg, M., Götze, J., Schönrock, M., Sinn, M., Berger, A., Nasca, E., Kostbade, K., Schumacher, B. M., et al. (2022) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100555 · Cited by 57
A Fracture Risk Assessment Tool for High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography
Whittier, D. E., Samelson, E. J., Hannan, M. T., Burt, L. A., Hanley, D. A., Biver, E., Szulc, P., Sornay‐Rendu, E., Merle, B., Chapurlat, R. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.4808 · Cited by 53
An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach
Zhou, G., Wu, C., Deng, B., Gao, T.-S., Lv, J., Lin, L. C., Chen, F., Kou, J., Zhang, Z.-X., Huang, X., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17672-w · Cited by 52
SurvTRACE
Wang, Z., & Sun, J. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3535508.3545521 · Cited by 74
Design principles to assemble drug combinations for effective tuberculosis therapy using interpretable pairwise drug response measurements
Larkins‐Ford, J., Degefu, Y. N., Van, N., Sokolov, A., & Aldridge, B. B. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100737 · Cited by 52
A novel hypoxia- and lactate metabolism-related signature to predict prognosis and immunotherapy responses for breast cancer by integrating machine learning and bioinformatic analyses
Li, J., Qiao, H., Wu, F., Sun, S., Feng, C., Li, C., Yan, W., Lv, W., Wu, H., Liu, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.998140 · Cited by 56
Prediction models of colorectal cancer prognosis incorporating perioperative longitudinal serum tumor markers: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
Li, C., Zhao, K., Zhang, D., Pang, X., Pu, H., Lei, M., Fan, B., Lv, J., You, D., Li, Z., et al. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-02773-2 · Cited by 52
Identifying Informative Predictor Variables With Random Forests
Rothacher, Y., & Strobl, C. (2023) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986231193327 · Cited by 55
Intervention in prediction measure: a new approach to assessing variable importance for random forests
Epifanio, I. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1650-8 · Cited by 53
Mapping crop cover using multi-temporal Landsat 8 OLI imagery
Sonobe, R., Yamaya, Y., Tani, H., Wang, X., Kobayashi, N., & MOCHIZUKI, K.-I. (2017) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1323286 · Cited by 52
Big Data Toolsets to Pharmacometrics: Application of Machine Learning for Time‐to‐Event Analysis
Gong, X., Hu, M., & Zhao, L. Y. (2018) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12541 · Cited by 55
Pancancer transcriptomic profiling identifies key PANoptosis markers as therapeutic targets for oncology
Mall, R., Bynigeri, R. R., Karki, R., Malireddi, R. K. S., Sharma, B. R., & Kanneganti, T. (2022) · NAR Cancer · doi:10.1093/narcan/zcac033 · Cited by 55
Visualizing the (Causal) Effect of a Continuous Variable on a Time-To-Event Outcome
Denz, R., & Timmesfeld, N. (2023) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001630 · Cited by 51
An automatically recursive feature elimination method based on threshold decision in random forest classification
Chen, C., Liang, J., Sun, W., Yang, G., & Meng, X. (2024) · Geo-spatial Information Science · doi:10.1080/10095020.2024.2387457 · Cited by 51
Investigating the prediction ability of survival models based on both clinical and omics data: two case studies
Bin, R. D., Sauerbrei, W., & Boulesteix, A. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6246 · Cited by 51
Improving failure modeling for gas transmission pipelines: A survival analysis and machine learning integrated approach
Xiao, R., Zayed, T. M., Meguid, M. A., & Sushama, L. (2023) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2023.109672 · Cited by 50
Predicting Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Pericarditis
Yesilyaprak, A., Kumar, A. K., Agrawal, A., Furqan, M. M., Verma, B. R., Syed, A. B., Majid, M., Akyuz, K., Rayes, D. L., Chen, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.072 · Cited by 50
Active Learning based Survival Regression for Censored Data
Vinzamuri, B., Li, Y., & Reddy, C. K. A. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2661829.2662065 · Cited by 50
Integration of Landsat time series and field plots for forest productivity estimates in decision support models
Boisvenue, C., Smiley, B. P., White, J. C., Kurz, W. A., & Wulder, M. A. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.022 · Cited by 50
Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data
Cui, Y., Zhu, R., & Kosorok, M. R. (2017) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/17-ejs1305 · Cited by 50
Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Survival in Kidney Transplantation: A Review
Diez-Sanmartín, C., & Cabezuelo, A. S. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9020572 · Cited by 50
A DYNAMIC CREDIT SCORING MODEL BASED ON SURVIVAL GRADIENT BOOSTING DECISION TREE APPROACH
Xia, Y., He, L., Li, Y., Fu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2020.13997 · Cited by 50
Computational identification of multi-omic correlates of anticancer therapeutic response
Stetson, L. C., Pearl, T., Chen, Y., & Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-s7-s2 · Cited by 49
Splitting on categorical predictors in random forests
Wright, M. N., & König, I. R. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6339 · Cited by 49
Combined unsupervised-supervised machine learning for phenotyping complex diseases with its application to obstructive sleep apnea
Ma, E.-Y., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Cho, S.-W., Kim, J. K., & Kim, J. K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84003-4 · Cited by 50
CAMR: cross-aligned multimodal representation learning for cancer survival prediction
Wu, X., Shi, Y., Wang, M., & Li, A. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad025 · Cited by 51
Precision Strike Strategy for Liver Diseases Trilogy with Xiao-Chai-Hu Decoction: A Meta-Analysis with Machine Learning
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Lu, X., Jin, C., Tu, L., Jiang, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2025) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156796 · Cited by 50
Greedy Outcome Weighted Tree Learning of Optimal Personalized Treatment Rules
Zhu, R., Zhao, Y.-Q., Chen, G., Ma, S., & Zhao, H. (2016) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12593 · Cited by 47
Predicting attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder severity from psychosocial stress and stress-response genes: a random forest regression approach
van der Meer, D., Hoekstra, P. J., van Donkelaar, M. M. J., Bralten, J., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., Faraone, S. V., Franke, B., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hartman, C. A. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.114 · Cited by 53
Gradient boosting survival tree with applications in credit scoring
Bai, M., Zheng, Y., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2021.1919035 · Cited by 48
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment
Herrin, J. S., Abraham, N. S., Yao, X., Noseworthy, P. A., Inselman, J., Shah, N. D., & Ngufor, C. G. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703 · Cited by 48
Automatic model selection for high-dimensional survival analysis
Lang, M., Kotthaus, H., Marwedel, P., Weihs, C., Rahnenführer, J., & Bischl, B. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949655.2014.929131 · Cited by 48
Residual Setup Errors Towards the Heart After Image Guidance Linked With Poorer Survival in Lung Cancer Patients: Do We Need Stricter IGRT Protocols?
Johnson‐Hart, C., Price, G. J., Finn, C. F., Aznar, M. C., & van Herk, M. (2018) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.052 · Cited by 48
An improved random forest algorithm and its application to wind pressure prediction
Li, L., Liang, T., Ai, S., & Tang, X. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22448 · Cited by 48
Predictors of long-term mortality among perioperative survivors of Fontan operation
Inai, K., Inuzuka, R., Ono, H., Nii, M., Ohtsuki, S., Kurita, Y., Takeda, A., Hirono, K., Takei, K., Yasukouchi, S., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab826 · Cited by 47
Vegetation structure from LiDAR explains the local richness of birds across Denmark
Davison, C. W., Assmann, J. J., Normand, S., Rahbek, C., & Morueta‐Holme, N. (2023) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13945 · Cited by 45
Predicting risk for adverse health events using random forest
Cafri, G., Luo, L., Paxton, E. W., & Fan, J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2017.1414166 · Cited by 47
Posterior Urethral Valves Outcomes Prediction (PUVOP): a machine learning tool to predict clinically relevant outcomes in boys with posterior urethral valves
Kwong, J. C. C., Khondker, A., Kim, J. K., Chua, M. E., Keefe, D. T., Santos, J. D., Skreta, M., Erdman, L., D’Souza, N., Selman-Fermin, A., et al. (2021) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-021-05321-3 · Cited by 47
Lessons and tips for designing a machine learning study using EHR data
Arbet, J., Brokamp, C., Meinzen-Derr, J., Trinkley, K. E., & Spratt, H. M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2020.513 · Cited by 46
Unraveling the Complexity of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival Prediction
Pfohl, S. R., Kim, R. B., Coan, G., & Mitchell, C. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2018.00036 · Cited by 46
Robotic Approach Offers Similar Nodal Upstaging to Open Lobectomy for Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Tang, A., Raja, S., Bribriesco, A., Raymond, D. P., Sudarshan, M., Murthy, S. C., & Ahmad, U. (2020) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.059 · Cited by 46
Deep learning for risk prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using multi-parametric MRIs
Jing, B., Deng, Y., Zhang, T., Hou, D., Li, B., Qiang, M., Liu, K., Ke, L., Li, T., Sun, Y., et al. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105684 · Cited by 46
Genome‐wide association study‐based deep learning for survival prediction
Sun, T., Wei, Y., Chen, W., & Ding, Y. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8743 · Cited by 48
Baseline and Dynamic Risk Predictors of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy
Wu, K. C., Wongvibulsin, S., Tao, S., Ashikaga, H., Stillabower, M. E., Dickfeld, T. M., Marine, J. E., Weiss, R. G., Tomaselli, G. F., & Zeger, S. L. (2020) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.120.017002 · Cited by 46
Territory-wide cohort study of Brugada syndrome in Hong Kong: predictors of long-term outcomes using random survival forests and non-negative matrix factorisation
Lee, S., Zhou, J., Li, K. H. C., Leung, K. S. K., Lakhani, I., Liu, T., Wong, I. C. K., Mok, N. S., Mak, C. M., Jeevaratnam, K., et al. (2021) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001505 · Cited by 45
Comparison of radiomic feature aggregation methods for patients with multiple tumors
Chang, E., Joel, M. Z., Chang, H., Du, J., Khanna, O., Omuro, A. M. P., Chiang, V., & Aneja, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89114-6 · Cited by 46
Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting oral cavity cancer prognosis
Adeoye, J., Hui, L., Koohi‐Moghadam, M., Tan, J., Choi, S. W., & Thomson, P. J. (2021) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104635 · Cited by 46
Extremes of age decrease survival in adults after lung transplant
Lehr, C. J., Blackstone, E. H., McCurry, K. R., Thuita, L., Tsuang, W. M., & Valapour, M. (2020) · Chest · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.042 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Conformalized survival analysis
Candès, E. J., Lei, L., & Ren, Z. (2023) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkac004 · Cited by 79
Machine learning for optimized individual survival prediction in resectable upper gastrointestinal cancer
Jung, J., Crnovrsanin, N., Wirsik, N. M., Nienhüser, H., Peters, L., Popp, F., Schulze, A., Wagner, M., Müller-Stich, B. P., Büchler, M. W., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-022-04063-5 · Cited by 45
SurvBenchmark: comprehensive benchmarking study of survival analysis methods using both omics data and clinical data
Zhang, Y., Wong, G., Mann, G. J., Müller, S., & Yang, J. Y. H. (2022) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giac071 · Cited by 51
The Development of a Prediction Model Based on Random Survival Forest for the Postoperative Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A SEER-Based Study
Lin, J., Yin, M., Liu, L., Gao, J., Yu, C., Liu, X., Xu, C., & Zhu, J. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14194667 · Cited by 45
Multivariate prediction of motor diagnosis in Huntington's disease: 12 years of PREDICT‐HD
Long, J. D., Paulsen, J. S., & PREDICT‐HD Investigators and Coordinators of the Huntington Study Group (2015) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26364 · Cited by 45
A gene expression signature distinguishes innate response and resistance to proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma
Mitra, A., Harding, T., Mukherjee, U. K., Jang, J. S., Li, Y., Res, H., Jen, J., Sonneveld, P., Kumar, S. K., Kuehl, W. M., et al. (2017) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2017.56 · Cited by 45
A weighted random survival forest
Utkin, L. V., Konstantinov, A. V., Chukanov, V. S., Kots, M. V., Ryabinin, M. A., & Мелдо, А. А. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.04.015 · Cited by 45
The highs and lows of herring: A meta‐analysis of patterns and factors in herring collapse and recovery
Trochta, J. T., Branch, T. A., Shelton, A. O., & Hay, D. E. (2020) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12452 · Cited by 47
Application and limitation of radiomics approach to prognostic prediction for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using breath‐hold CT images with random survival forest: A multi‐institutional study
Kakino, R., Nakamura, M., Mitsuyoshi, T., Shintani, T., Kokubo, M., Negoro, Y., Fushiki, M., Ogura, M., Itasaka, S., Yamauchi, C., et al. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14380 · Cited by 45
Using multimarker screening to identify biomarkers associated with cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation
Pol, T., Hijazi, Z., Lindbäck, J., Oldgren, J., Alexander, J. H., Connolly, S. J., Eikelboom, J. W., Ezekowitz, M. D., Granger, C. B., Lópes, R. D., et al. (2021) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvab262 · Cited by 45
Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention
Attallah, O., Karthikesalingam, A., Holt, P., Thompson, M. M., Sayers, R. D., Bown, M. J., Choke, E., & Ma, X. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0508-3 · Cited by 45
Simplicity at the cost of predictive accuracy in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a critical assessment of the R‐ IPI , IPI , and NCCN ‐ IPI
Biccler, J. L., Eloranta, S., Brown, P. D. N., Frederiksen, H., Jerkeman, M., Smedby, K. E. E., Bøgsted, M., & El‐Galaly, T. C. (2017) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1271 · Cited by 44
Extreme learning machine Cox model for high‐dimensional survival analysis
Wang, H., & Li, G. (2019) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8090 · Cited by 43
Machine learning and AI for long-term fault prognosis in complex manufacturing systems
Bukkapatnam, S., Afrin, K., Dave, D., & Kumara, S. R. T. (2019) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.104 · Cited by 44
Promising Prognosis Marker Candidates on the Status of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition and Glioma Stem Cells in Glioblastoma
Takashima, Y., Kawaguchi, A., & Yamanaka, R. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8111312 · Cited by 44
$$\text {DRTOP}$$: deep learning-based radiomics for the time-to-event outcome prediction in lung cancer
Afshar, P., Mohammadi, A., Tyrrell, P. N., Cheung, P., Sigiuk, A., Plataniotis, K. N., Nguyen, E. T., & Oikonomou, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69106-8 · Cited by 44
Deep learning based prediction of prognosis in nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Byun, S., Heo, T.-S., Choi, J.-M., Jeong, Y. S., Kim, Y. S., Lee, W. K., & Kim, C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80262-9 · Cited by 44
Random Survival Forests
Ishwaran, H., & Lü, M. (2019) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat08188 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation
Hwang, D., Lee, J. M., Yang, S., Chang, M., Zhang, J., Choi, K. H., Kim, C. H., Nam, C., Shin, E., Kwak, J.-J., et al. (2020) · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.041 · Cited by 43
FloReMi: Flow density survival regression using minimal feature redundancy
Gassen, S. V., Vens, C., Dhaene, T., Lambrecht, B. N., & Saeys, Y. (2015) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.22734 · Cited by 43
Integrating multidimensional omics data for cancer outcome
Zhu, R., Zhao, Q., Zhao, H., & Ma, S. (2016) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxw010 · Cited by 43
MV-kWNN: A novel multivariate and multi-output weighted nearest neighbours algorithm for big data time series forecasting
Talavera-Llames, R., Pérez-Chacón, R., Troncoso, A., & Alvarez, F. M. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.07.092 · Cited by 43
Stepwise detection and evaluation reveal miR-10b and miR-222 as a remarkable prognostic pair for glioblastoma
Sun, B., Zhao, X., Ming, J., Liu, X., Liu, D., & Jiang, C. (2019) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-019-0867-6 · Cited by 45
Optimal survival trees
Bertsimas, D., Dunn, J., Gibson, E., & Orfanoudaki, A. (2022) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-06117-0 · Cited by 51
Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Immune Features Associated with Immunotherapy Benefit in Patients with Squamous Cell Lung Cancer from Phase III Lung-MAP S1400I Trial
Parra, E. R., Zhang, J., Duose, D. Y., Gonzalez‐Kozlova, E., Redman, M. W., Chen, H., Manyam, G. C., Kumar, G., Zhang, J., Song, X., et al. (2024) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0251 · Cited by 43
Prediction of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Related Mortality- Lessons Learned from the In-Silico Approach: A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party Data Mining Study
Shouval, R., Labopin, M., Unger, R., Giebel, S., Ciceri, F., Schmid, C., Esteve, J., Baron, F., Gorin, N. C., Savani, B. N., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150637 · Cited by 42
Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study
Widmann, B., Galata, C. L., Warschkow, R., Beutner, U., Ögredici, Ö., Hetzer, F. H., Schmied, B. M., Post, S., & Marti, L. (2019) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm17106 · Cited by 42
Survival cluster analysis
Chapfuwa, P., Li, C., Mehta, N., Carin, L., & Henao, R. (2020) · ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (CHIL) · doi:10.1145/3368555.3384465 · Cited by 42
DLIN: Deep Ladder Imputation Network
Hallaji, E., Razavi‐Far, R., & Saif, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3054878 · Cited by 42
Combining Machine Learning and Survival Statistics to Predict Remaining Service Life of Watermains
Snider, B., & McBean, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000629 · Cited by 42
Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis for High-Dimensional Survival Data
Ha, I. D., Hao, L., Kim, J., & 권숙희 (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9111244 · Cited by 46
Data Science for Economics and Finance
Consoli, S., Recupero, D. R., & Saisana, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66891-4 · Cited by 53
CT Radiomics–Based Preoperative Survival Prediction in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Park, S., Sham, J. G., Kawamoto, S., Blair, A. B., Rozich, N., Fouladi, D. F., Shayesteh, S., Hruban, R. H., He, J., Wolfgang, C. L., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.20.23490 · Cited by 42
Balance between transmitted HLA preadapted and nonassociated polymorphisms is a major determinant of HIV-1 disease progression
Mónaco, D. C., Dilernia, D. A., Fiore-Gartland, A. J., Yu, T., Prince, J. L., Dennis, K. K., Qin, K., Schaefer, M. R., Claiborne, D. T., Kilembe, W., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20151984 · Cited by 41
Tumor heterogeneity estimation for radiomics in cancer
Eloyan, A., Yue, M. S., & Khachatryan, D. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8749 · Cited by 41
A Brief Review on Deep Learning Applications in Genomic Studies
Shen, X., Jiang, C., Wen, Y., Li, C., & Lu, Q. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Systems Biology · doi:10.3389/fsysb.2022.877717 · Cited by 44
Genomic landscape of patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated within the CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial
Jahn, N., Jahn, E., Saadati, M., Bullinger, L., Larson, R. A., Ottone, T., Amadori, S., Prior, T. W., Brandwein, J. M., Appelbaum, F. R., et al. (2022) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01650-w · Cited by 43

Authors: Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Blackstone, E. H., & Lauer, M. S.
ORCID: Lauer, Michael S.
Venue: The Annals of Applied Statistics
Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Published: 2008-09-01
Volume: 2
Issue: 3
Pages: 841-860
ISSN: 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
1941-7330
DOI: 10.1214/08-aoas169
OpenAlex: W2052825782
Cited by: 2,714
References: 27
Citations by year: 2026: 357 · 2025: 341 · 2024: 354 · 2023: 324 · 2022: 296 · 2021: 278 · 2020: 183 · 2019: 148 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI: 14.21
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
arxiv.org
Locations: The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders: National Institutes of Health
Topics: Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords: random survival forest, right-censored survival data, survival trees, missing data imputation, prognostic model, body mass, coronary artery disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Random survival forests

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks