The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified approach to model selection and sparse recovery using regularized least squares
Open accessAbstract
Model selection and sparse recovery are two important problems for which many regularization methods have been proposed. We study the properties of regularization methods in both problems under the unified framework of regularized least squares with concave penalties. For model selection, we establish conditions under which a regularized least squares estimator enjoys a nonasymptotic property, called the weak oracle property, where the dimensionality can grow exponentially with sample size. For sparse recovery, we present a sufficient condition that ensures the recoverability of the sparsest solution. In particular, we approach both problems by considering a family of penalties that give a smooth homotopy between L0 and L1 penalties. We also propose the sequentially and iteratively reweighted squares (SIRS) algorithm for sparse recovery. Numerical studies support our theoretical results and demonstrate the advantage of our new methods for model selection and sparse recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Cited by
A framework for feature selection in clustering
Witten, D. M., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09415 · Cited by 696
Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens
Bertsimas, D., King, A., & Mazumder, R. (2016) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aos1388 · Cited by 655
Minimization of $\ell_{1-2}$ for Compressed Sensing
Yin, P., Lou, Y., He, Q., & Xin, J. (2015) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/140952363 · Cited by 473
Tuning Parameter Selection in High Dimensional Penalized Likelihood
Fan, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12001 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lv, J., & Fan, Y.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6A
- Pages
- 3498-3528
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101083207
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified approach to model selection and sparse recovery using regularized least squares. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/09-aos683
- The paper
- Lv, J., & Fan, Y. (2009). A unified approach to model selection and sparse recovery using regularized least squares. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-aos683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.