The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens
Open accessAbstract
In the period 1991–2015, algorithmic advances in Mixed Integer Optimization (MIO) coupled with hardware improvements have resulted in an astonishing 450 billion factor speedup in solving MIO problems. We present a MIO approach for solving the classical best subset selection problem of choosing $k$ out of $p$ features in linear regression given $n$ observations. We develop a discrete extension of modern first-order continuous optimization methods to find high quality feasible solutions that we use as warm starts to a MIO solver that finds provably optimal solutions. The resulting algorithm (a) provides a solution with a guarantee on its suboptimality even if we terminate the algorithm early, (b) can accommodate side constraints on the coefficients of the linear regression and (c) extends to finding best subset solutions for the least absolute deviation loss function. Using a wide variety of synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate that our approach solves problems with $n$ in the 1000s and $p$ in the 100s in minutes to provable optimality, and finds near optimal solutions for $n$ in the 100s and $p$ in the 1000s in minutes. We also establish via numerical experiments that the MIO approach performs better than Lasso and other popularly used sparse learning procedures, in terms of achieving sparse solutions with good predictive power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage
Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 · Cited by 8,760
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827596304010 · Cited by 6,845
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?
Candes, E. J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.885507 · Cited by 6,839
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
Zhang, C.-H. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos729 · Cited by 3,835
Cited by
Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2019) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433 · Cited by 1,163
A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping
Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P., & Stephens, M. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12388 · Cited by 1,121
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2023) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4455 · Cited by 477
Optimization problems for machine learning: A survey
Gambella, C., Ghaddar, B., & Naoum-Sawaya, J. (2021) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.045 · Cited by 365
DC formulations and algorithms for sparse optimization problems
Gotoh, J.-Y., Takeda, A., & Tono, K. (2018) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1181-0 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertsimas, D., King, A., & Mazumder, R.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 813-852
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1936663733
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 44.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/15-aos1388
- The paper
- Bertsimas, D., King, A., & Mazumder, R. (2016). Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-aos1388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.